What is Body Image and How Do You Improve It?

What is body image?

  • How you see or picture yourself.
  • How you feel others perceive you.
  • What you believe about your physical appearance.
  • How you feel about your body image.
  • How you feel in your body.

Improving Your Body Image

by Judy Lightstone

"If we place pornography and the tyranny of slenderness alongside one another we have the two most significant obsessions of our culture, and both of them focused upon a woman's body." -Kim Chernin

Body image involves our perception, imagination, emotions, and physical sensations of and about our bodies. It s not static- but ever changing; sensitive to changes in mood, environment, and physical experience. It is not based on fact. It is psychological in nature, and much more influenced by self-esteem than by actual physical attractiveness as judged by others. It is not inborn, but learned. This learning occurs in the family and among peers, but these only reinforce what is learned and expected culturally.

In this culture, we women are starving ourselves , starving our children and loved ones, gorging ourselves, gorging our children and loved ones, alternating between starving and gorging, purging, obsessing, and all the while hating, pounding and wanting to remove that which makes us female: our bodies, our curves, our pear-shaped selves.

How do you feel about your body image? Not happy? Here's how to go about improving your body image."Cosmetic surgery is the fastest growing 'medical' specialty.... Throughout the 80s, as women gained power, unprecedented numbers of them sought out and submitted to the knife...." - Naomi Wolf

The work of feminist object relations theorists such as Susie Orbach (author of Fat is a Feminist Issue, and Hunger Strike: Anorexia as a Metaphor for Our Age) and those at The Women's Therapy Centre Institute (authors of Eating Problems: a Feminist Psychoanalytic Treatment Model) has demonstrated a relationship between the development of personal boundaries and body image. Personal boundaries are the physical and emotional borders around us.. A concrete example of a physical boundary is our skin. It distinguishes between that which is inside you and that which is outside you. On a psychological level, a person with strong boundaries might be able to help out well in disasters- feeling concerned for others, but able to keep a clear sense of who they are. Someone with weak boundaries might have sex with inappropriate people, forgetting where they end and where others begin. Such a person way not feel "whole" when alone.

Our psychological boundaries develop early in life, based on how we are held and touched (or not held and touched). A person who is deprived of touch as an infant or young child, for example, may not have the sensory information s/he needs to distinguish between what is inside and what is outside her/himself. As a result, boundaries may be unclear or unformed. This could cause the person to have difficulty getting an accurate sense of his/her body shape and size. This person might also have difficulty eating, because they might have trouble sensing the physical boundaries of hunger and fullness or satiation. On the other extreme, a child who is sexually or physically abused may feel terrible pain and shame or loathing associated to his/her body. Such a person might use food or starvation to continue the physical punishments they grew familiar with in childhood.

Developing a Healthy Body Image

Here are some guidelines (Adapted from BodyLove: Learning to Like Our Looks and Ourselves, Rita Freeman, Ph.D.) that can help you work toward a positive body image:

  1. Listen to your body. Eat when you are hungry.
  2. Be realistic about the size you are likely to be based on your genetic and environmental history.
  3. Exercise regularly in an enjoyable way, regardless of size.
  4. Expect normal weekly and monthly changes in weight and shape.
  5. Work towards self acceptance and self forgiveness- be gentle with yourself.
  6. Ask for support and encouragement from friends and family when life is stressful.
  7. Decide how you wish to spend your energy -- pursuing the "perfect body image" or enjoying family, friends, school and, most importantly, life.

Think of it as the three A's

Attention: Refers to listening for and responding to internal cues (i.e., hunger, satiety, fatigue).

Appreciation: Refers to appreciating the pleasures your body can provide.

Acceptance: Refers to accepting what is -- instead of longing for what is not.

Healthy body weight is the size a person naturally returns to after a long period of both non-compulsive eating* and consistent exercise commensurate with the person' s physical health and condition. We must learn to advocate for ourselves and our children to aspire to a naturally determined size, even though that will often mean confronting misinformed family, friends, and media advertising again and again.

*Simply stated, non-compulsive eating means eating when you are hungry and stopping when you are satisfied. This involves being able to distinguish emotional hunger from physical hunger, and satiation from over fullness.

Judy Lightstone, M.F.C.C. is a licensed Marriage, Family, Child Counselor in Berkely, CA. She has a private practice where she works with individuals and couples.Visit her website at www.psychotherapist.org. Permission for use granted by Judy Lightstone

next: Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Children
~ eating disorders library
~ all articles on eating disorders

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). What is Body Image and How Do You Improve It?, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/eating-disorders/articles/what-is-body-image-and-how-do-you-improve-it

Last Updated: January 14, 2014

The Dating Daze!

The grown-up dating game has never been more interesting and challenging. There are more players than ever before. Why? Because of higher divorce rates, longer life spans, and a greater tendency to never marry. This contributes to more single Americans than at any other time in our country's history.

The U.S. Census Bureau tells us that of the 97 million Americans who are 45 or older, almost 40 percent - 36.2 million - are available singles. There is no shame in being single.

The Dating Daze!This book, featuring the collective wisdom of many shameless romantics, is designed to give you a clearer picture of the good, bad, and decidedly challenging aspects of singledom, dating, finding romance and possibly finding your soul mate.

Over the years the dating game has evolved into some very creative ways to help us get connected. Various forms of dating services, personal ads, special interest groups, singles ministries in large churches, resort inspired singles vacations and the recent explosion of the Internet has made seeking love and companionship as routine as shopping for groceries.

When you are young, dating and your hormones are dancing, it is easy to make dating decisions based on how you "feel" in the moment. Go slow. True love takes time to mature. Rushing into a relationship will most assuredly automatically reserve you a room at the heartbreak hotel.

The older a person gets, the more he or she becomes a practical dater, rather than being emotionally driven. Older singles seem to demonstrate greater wisdom, grace and maturity in connecting with others, which is a prerequisite in dating.

As recently as 25 years ago, when someone over 50 was on the prowl, most people assumed that the person was widowed. However, today a solo single in his or her 50's or 60's is most likely divorced. About 18 percent of all Americans 50 to 69 are either divorced or have never been married. Only about 9 percent are widowed.

Relationships never end. Divorce or death only changes them. As long as you have memory, you will have a relationship. Take time to grieve, and then get on with your life.


continue story below


Wading around in the dating pool? Hesitating because the dating game has changed dramatically since you were in your 20s? Sooner or later - if you truly desire a relationship - you must jump in. Make a big splash. When you decide that you are ready to play the dating game, look at it as an adventure.

Awkward first dates are a drag, however the more you have, the more comfortable you will become. Date lots of people and set a higher priority on having fun rather than looking for a mate.

Some singles hesitate to look for romance because they are aware that second marriages are statistically more likely to fail than first marriages.

Others stay on the dating sidelines because of an uneasy feeling about intimacy. It's okay to say, "No!" Some seek out groups that allows them to sidestep sex entirely. When there is this kind of agreement in place in the group, it takes the pressure off.

Another dating obstacle for women is that they live longer then men. This is a medical blessing and a dating curse. As age increases the ratio of available men goes down. This often causes some women to become discouraged.

Singles who shack up without marrying are also more likely to have relationships that eventually fall apart at the seams with numerous unforeseen complications.

So what if you are suddenly single because of divorce? Enter the dating arena slowly. Rule of thumb: At least six months or more.

"Or more?" you say. Yes! Six months or more!

When you cut your finger. It takes time for the wound to heal. If the sharp edge cuts to the bone, it may take longer. A thorough healing of a broken heart takes time too.

The biggest mistake that newly singles make is getting involved with someone else before the hurts of the past have healed.

When you are mature enough to accept responsibility for your share of the problems that caused your singleness, and if you have learn the lessons that past mistakes have presented, then perhaps beginning again can be looked upon as a good thing.

Another survey reports that 56 percent of all singles are currently separated or divorced from a spouse. If you are suffering from the agony of the "Bitter-Ex" Syndrome beware of revealing your baggage especially on a first date. The effect it has on finding romance is devastating. Only reveal what is relevant to the relationship you are seeking.

By the way, dating someone who has a lot of baggage is high on the complaint list for both women and men.

Before you begin dating, think long and hard about what you need from a relationship. The payoff is big. There is no Mr. or Ms. Right; no perfect mate. Relationships are something that must be worked on "all the time," not only when they are broken and need to be fixed. It is wise to seek a partner who understands this concept and who will commit to work on the relationship with you.

It may be wise to suspend your expectations about how a partner "should" be and instead focus on what you need from a relationship. When it becomes obvious that someone you are dating cannot fulfill your needs, it time to shout, "Next!" and move on. The sooner the better.

Romance often carries a high risk of disappointment, however those singles savvy enough to predefine their needs and who are willing to take the time to prepare for love will most assuredly find it.

As long as you make yourself available to having a relationship, when you are ready for love it will find you.

Are you someone who "you" might like to spend the rest of your life with?

next: 25 Words or Less: Connecting With Personal Ads

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). The Dating Daze!, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/relationships/celebrate-love/dating-daze

Last Updated: May 22, 2015

Siblings of Children with Special Needs

This fact sheet is about the brothers and sisters of children with a severe disability or chronic illness. It is written for parents and for those working with families who have a child with special needs.

Introduction

Every child and family is different and not all the points mentioned here will apply to every situation. The issues discussed are those brought up most often by parents and brothers and sisters themselves.

Spotlight on Siblings

This Fact sheet is about the brothers and sisters of children who have a severe disability or chronic illness. It is written for parents and for those working with families who have a child with special needs.Most of us grow up with one or more brothers or sisters. How we get on with them can influence the way we develop and what sort of people we become.

As young children, we may spend more time with our brothers and sisters than with our parents. Relationships with our siblings are likely to be the longest we have and can be important throughout our adult lives too.

In previous times, children with a disability or chronic illness may have spent long periods in hospital or have lived there permanently. Today nearly all children, whatever they're special need, spend most of their time with their family. This means that their contact with their brothers and sisters is more continuous. So it is not surprising that parents have recently been wanting to talk about the importance of siblings and the ups and downs of their daily lives and to seek advice about handling the difficulties that can sometimes arise.

Research about Siblings

Studies about siblings of people with special needs have tended to report a mixed experience; an often close relationship with some difficulties. Sibling relationships generally of course tend to be a mixture of love and hate, rivalry and loyalty. In one study, a group of siblings were reported as having stronger feelings about their brother and sister - either liking or disliking them more - than a matched group did about their non-disabled brothers and sisters. As one grown up sibling said:

"It's the same as in any brother or sister relationship only the feelings are exaggerated."

Often having to put the needs of the disabled child first seems to encourage an early maturity in brothers and sisters. Parents may worry that siblings have to grow up too quickly but they are often described as very responsible and sensitive to the needs and feelings of others. Some adult siblings say that their brother or sister has brought something special to their lives.

"Having Charlie has promoted more family activities, and a more affectionate relationship between us all".

29 siblings aged between 8 and 16 were interviewed in a recent study[1]. All said that they helped to care for their brother or sister about whom they spoke with love and affection. The difficulties they experienced were:

  • Being teased or bullied at school
  • Feeling jealous at the amount of attention their brother or sister received
  • Feeling resentful because family outings were limited and infrequent.
  • Having their sleep disturbed and feeling tired at school
  • Finding it hard to complete homework
  • Being embarrassed about their brother or sister's behaviour in public, usually because of the reaction of others.

Growing up together

Most siblings cope very well with their childhood experiences and sometimes feel strengthened by them. They seem to do best when parents, and other adults in their lives, can accept their brother or sister's special needs and clearly value them as an individual. Avoiding family secrets, as well as giving siblings the chance to talk things over and express feelings and opinions, can go a long way to help them deal with worries and difficulties that are bound to arise from time to time.

Below we highlight some of the issues that often crop up for siblings of a child with special needs, and some examples of the ways parents have found of responding to these:

Limited time and attention from parents

  • Protect certain times to spend with siblings, e.g. bedtime, cinema once a month

  • Organise short term care for important events such as sports days

  • Sometimes put the needs of siblings first and let them choose what to do

 




Why them and not me?

  • Emphasise that no-one is to blame for their brother's or sister's difficulties

  • Come to terms yourself with your child's special needs

  • Encourage siblings to see their brother or sister as a person with similarities and differences to themselves.

  • Meet other families who have a child with a similar condition, perhaps through a support

  • Organization

Worry about bringing friends home.

  • Talk over how to explain a brother's or sister's difficulties to friends

  • Invite friends round when the disabled child is away

  • Don't expect siblings to always include the child with special needs in their play or activities

Stressful situations at home

  • Encourage siblings to develop their own social life

  • A lock on a bedroom door can ensure privacy and avoid possessions being damaged

  • Get professional advice about caring tasks and handling difficult behaviour in which siblings can be included

  • Try to keep the family's sense of humour

Restrictions on family activities

  • Try to find normal family activities that everyone can enjoy, e.g. swimming, picnics

  • See if there are holiday schemes the sibling or disabled child can take part in

  • Use help from family or friends with the disabled child or siblings

Guilt about being angry with a disabled brother or sister

  • Make it clear that it's alright to be angry sometimes - strong feelings are part of any close relationship

  • Share some of your own mixed feelings at times

  • Siblings may want to talk to someone outside the family

Embarrassment about a brother or sister in public

  • Realise that non-disabled relatives can be embarrassing, especially parents

  • Find social situations where the disabled child is accepted

  • If old enough, split up for a while when out together

Teasing or bullying about a brother or sister

  • Recognise that this is a possibility .... and notice signs of distress

  • Ask your child's school to encourage positive attitudes to disability

  • Rehearse how to handle unpleasant remarks

Protectiveness about a very dependent or ill brother or sister

  • Explain clearly about the diagnosis and expected prognosis - not knowing can be more worrying

  • Make sure arrangements for the other children can be made in an emergency

  • Allow siblings to express their anxiety and ask questions

Concerns about the future

  • Talk over plans for the care of the disabled child with siblings and see what they thinkFind out about opportunities for genetic advice if this is relevant and what siblings wantEncourage them to leave home when they are ready.




An adult sister remembers:

I am one of five girls. I am the eldest and was 11 years old when Helen was born. She was a beautiful baby and I fell in love with her instantly.

However, as time went by I gathered from various overheard conversations that something was seriously amiss. Helen had profound physical and mental disabilities and there was a lot of disagreements between my parents on the best thing to do. There were loads of visitors and phone calls but noon ever really explained what was going on.

Eventually my parents joined the local Mencap group. They found this very helpful but I was not keen on having to join them in attending the social activities when I preferred to see my own friends.

One of the difficult things for me was not having enough of my parents 'attention. As the eldest I was often the "little mother". I felt obliged to be supportive to my parents and felt guilty about resenting this. It was not acceptable to complain about Helen's behaviour even though she often bit or attacked us. I was told how lucky I was to have a sister like Helen - a view I did not always share!

It was not until I became an adult that my sisters and I actually talked together about our experiences of growing up with Helen. As a parent myself now I understand how tough it was for my parents. I realise too, that I would have had to compete for attention anyway with four sisters even if one had not had special needs. These days one of my greatest pleasures is the delighted smile on Helen's face when she sees me.

How one family planned for the future:

Ever since I was a teenager I've been anxious about who would care for my brother when both my parents die. I have three brothers of whom John is the youngest. He is 25 and has learning difficulties. He has always lived at home with my parents. I used to feel concerned that my parents had made assumptions about who John's main carer would be and they seemed unwilling to consider any alternatives Three years ago I encouraged them to hold a meeting with all the key family members, including John, to talk about his long term care arrangements. We had a fairly formal meeting, which my husband chaired. We began by acknowledging that Mum and Dad would not be around forever to look after John and that we should get some sort of plan down in writing which we could review a ta later date.

Then we each took it in turn to say what we felt would be the most positive arrangement for John and what level of involvement we wanted to have in his care. It was great having someone chair the meeting so that we were not interrupted even if we said something that others disagreed with. I was actually surprised at how much in common our views were, and how each of us wanted to contribute to John's care. The main areas where we felt differently were about how much money my parents should put into a trust, and about what rights John had as an adult. I certainly felt for the first time that I had a chance to say what I felt about these things.

We came to a joint agreement about what should happen and about what financia1 support would be available. We recognised that there were some issues that we still felt differently about. We agreed to review our plans in 5 year's time, or in the event of changing circumstances.

At the end of the meeting I felt very relieved that at last there would be something on paper, and that we all were sharing the responsibility for John's care. Since then my father has died and I'm so glad he had the chance to say what he wanted for John.

Working Together for Siblings

Parents are already short of time and energy and mustn't feel that they have to handle everything alone. Those who belong to support groups maybe able to swap ideas with other parents or they could suggest a discussion about siblings at one of their meetings. Any of the agencies a family is in touch with can play their part in supporting siblings, whether health, social services, education or from the voluntary sector.

Increased awareness by professionals of the other children in a family, and recognition of their special situation, can help these siblings to feel that they are part of what's going on. Some of the ways in which this might happen include:

  • professionals speaking directly to siblings to provide information and advice
  • listening to the sibling's point of view - their ideas may be different to those of their parents trying to understand the particular rewards and difficulties they encounter and how these may affect their daily lives
  • offering someone outside the family to talk things over with in confidence
  • providing support that is flexible enough to accommodate the needs of siblings as well as the child with special needs and their parents



Siblings Groups

One of the ways of supporting siblings that has been developing recently is group work. Many groups are started by local professionals working together with the support of parents. They tend to be run on a similar format:

  • about 8 children or young people take part within a narrow age range, e.g. 9 to 11, 12 to 14
  • the group meets weekly for 2 hours over 6 to 8 weeks, plus reunions
  • the adults running the group come from several different agencies and professional backgrounds, e.g. teaching, child care , psychology, youth work
  • groups offer a mixture of recreation, socialising, discussion and activities such as games and role play; the emphasis is on self expression and enjoyment
  • transport is often provided and can offer an extra opportunity for talking
  • confidentiality within the group is emphasised
  • the group is encouraged to feel the group is theirs, deciding on rules and activities

Those who work with groups of siblings often comment that they learn a great deal from the youngsters taking part. The benefits to siblings include meeting others in a similar position, sharing ideas about coping with difficult situations and having a good time.

"It helped to know that I'm not alone with a disabled brother or sister"
"I liked the trip we had - I'd never been on a train before"

Not all siblings will want to join a group or have the chance to do so, and sometimes supporting a young person individually will be necessary as well as or instead of group work. Projects for young carers often also include siblings in their work and usually offer a mixture of individual and group support.

Siblings and the Law

The Children Act 1989 is the framework for the support offered to children "in need", including those with disabilities. The approach of this legislation is to emphasise the child as part of their family. As well as one or two parents, this might include brothers and sisters, grand parents or other relatives, who are often important figures in any child's life. The Guidance and Regulations of the Children Act, which refers to children with disabilities [2], states that "the needs of brothers and sisters should not be overlooked and they should be provided for as part of a package of services for the child with a disability". So siblings should now be on the agenda of agencies that aim to support families where a child has special needs.

Sometimes brothers and sisters who provide a substantial amount of care are described as young carers. Under the Carers (Recognition and Services) Act, which comes into force in April 1996, carers, including those under 18, are entitled to their own assessment. When the needs of the person being cared for are reviewed. However at present there is no requirement for services to support young carers to be provided.

Further Reading

  • Brothers, Sisters and Special Needs by Debra Lobato (1990) Publishedby Paul Brookes.
  • Brothers and Sisters - a Special Part of Exceptional Families by Thomas Powell and Peggy Gallagher (1993) Published by Paul Brookes(These two books from the USA have a lot of information and ideas suitable for parents and practitioners.)
  • The Other Children, and We Were the Other Children. Videos and workbook available for hire from Mencap, 123 Golden Lane, London EC1Y0RT. Training material, which covers the main, issues and shows examples of group work
  • Siblings Group Manual by Yvonne McPhee. Price £ 15.00. Available from Yvonne McPhee, 15 Down Side, Cheam, Surrey SM2 7EH. A manual based on work in Australia with practical ideas for those running groups. Brothers, Sisters and Learning Disability - A Guide for Parents by Rosemary Tozer (1996) Price £ 6.00 including p&p. Available from the British Institute of Learning Disabilities (BILD), Wolverhampton Road, Kidderminster DY10 3PP.
  • Children with Autism - a booklet for brothers and sisters by JulieDavies. Published by the Mental Health Foundation. Price £2.50 plus75p p&p for single copies. Available from the National Autistic Society, 276 Willesden Lane, London NW2 5RB. Suitable for children aged 7 upwards, and developed from group work with siblings.

About the author: Contact a Family is a UK-wide charity providing support, advice and information for families with disabled children.


 


next: Strategies for Enhancing Social Interaction in ADHD Children
~ back to adders.org homepage
~ adhd library articles
~ all add/adhd articles

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). Siblings of Children with Special Needs, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/adhd/articles/siblings-of-children-with-special-needs

Last Updated: February 13, 2016

Top 100 "Romantic" Movies

NOTE: Clicking on a romantic movie title link will take you to where you can purchase that romantic movie.

HeartHeartHeart

Top 100 "Romantic" Movies

 

The American Film Institute chose Casablanca as its top U.S. screen romance movie in a list recently. The film institute began issuing annual lists on different  

Casablanca - 1942 - Humphrey Bogartmovie themes in 1998. The love story list was chosen by about 1,800 directors, actors, studio executives, critics and others in Hollywood, who voted from a field of 400 nominated films.

    1. Gone With the Wind - 1939 - Clark Gable
    2. West Side Story - 1961 - Natalie Wood
    3. Roman Holiday - 1953 - Gregory Peck
    4. An Affair to Remember - 1957 - Cary Grant 
    5. The Way We Were - 1973 - Barbra Streisand
    6. Doctor Zhivago - 1965 - Omar Sharif
    7. It's a Wonderful Life - 1946 - James Stewart
    8. Love Story - 1970 - Ali MacGraw
    9. City Lights - 1931 - Charles Chaplin
    10. Annie Hall - 1977 - Woody Allen
    11. My Fair Lady - 1964 - Audrey Hepburn
    12. Out of Africa - 1985 - Meryl Streep
    13. The African Queen - 1951 - Humphrey Bogart
    14. Wuthering Heights - 1939 - Merle Oberon
    15. Singin' in the Rain - 1952 - Gene Kelly
    16. Moonstruck - 1987 - Cher
    17. Vertigo - 1958 - James Stewart
    18. Ghost - 1990 - Patrick Swayze
    19. From Here to Eternity - 1953 - Burt Lancaster
    20. Pretty Woman - 1990 - Richard Gere
    21. On Golden Pond - 1981 - Katharine Hepburn
    22. Now, Voyager - 1942 - Bette Davis
    23. King Kong - 1933 - Fay Wray

continue story below


  1. When Harry Met Sally - 1989 - Billy Crystal
  2. The Lady Eve - 1941 - Barbara Stanwyck
  3. The Sound of Music - 1965 - Julie Andrews
  4. The Shop Around the Corner - 1940 - James Stewart
  5. An Officer and a Gentleman - 1982 - Richard Gere
  6. Swing Time - 1936 - Fred Astaire
  7. The King and I - 1956 - Deborah Kerr
  8. Dark Victory - 1939 - Bette Davis
  9. Camille - 1937 - Greta Garbo
  10. Beauty and the Beast - 1991 - Paige O'Hara
  11. Gigi - 1958 - Leslie Caron
  12. Random Harvest - 1942 - Ronald Colman
  13. Titanic - 1997 - Leonardo DiCaprio
  14. It Happened One Night - 1934 - Clark Gable
  15. An American in Paris - 1951 - Gene Kelly
  16. Ninotchka - 1939 - Greta Garbo
  17. Funny Girl - 1968 - Barbra Streisand
  18. Anna Karenina - 1935 - Vivien Leigh
  19. A Star is Born - 1954 - Judy Garland
  20. The Philadelphia Story - 1940 - Cary Grant
  21. Sleepless in Seattle - 1993 - Tom Hanks
  22. To Catch a Thief - 1955 - Cary Grant
  23. Splendor in the Grass - 1961 - Natalie Wood
  24. Last Tango in Paris - 1972 - Marlon Brando
  25. The Postman Always Rings Twice - 1946 - Lana Turner
  26. Shakespeare in Love - 1998 - Gwyneth Paltrow
  27. Bringing Up Baby - 1938 - Katharine Hepburn
  28. The Graduate - 1967 - Anne Bancroft
  29. A Place in the Sun - 1951 - Montgomery Clift
  30. Sabrina - 1954 - Humphrey Bogart
  31. Reds - 1981 - Warren Beatty
  32. The English Patient - 1996 - Ralph Fiennes
  33. Two for the Road - 1967 - Audrey Hepburn
  34. Guess Who's Coming to Dinner - 1967 - Spencer Tracy
  35. Picnic - 1955 - William Holden
  36. To Have and Have Not - 1944 - Humphrey Bogart
  37. Breakfast at Tiffany's - 1961 - Audrey Hepburn
  38. The Apartment - 1960 - Jack Lemmon
  39. Sunrise - 1927 - George O'Brien (No longer available)
  40. Marty - 1955 - Ernest Borgnine
  41. Bonnie and Clyde - 1967 - Warren Beatty
  42. Manhattan - 1979 - Woody Allen
  43. A Streetcar Named Desire - 1951 - Vivien Leigh
  44. What's Up Doc? - 1972 - Barbra Streisand
  45. Harold and Maude - 1971 - Ruth Gordon
  46. Sense and Sensibility - 1995 - Emma Thompson
  47. Way Down East - 1920 - Lillian Gish
  48. Roxanne - 1987 - Steve Martin
  49. The Ghost and Mrs. Muir - 1947 - Gene Tierney
  50. Woman of the Year - 1942 - Spencer Tracy
  51. The American President - 1995 - Michael Douglas
  52. Quiet Man - 1952 - John Wayne
  53. The Awful Truth - 1937 - Irene Dunne
  54. Coming Home - 1978 - Jane Fonda
  55. Jezebel - 1939 - Bette Davis
  56. The Sheik - 1921 - Rudolph Valentino
  57. The Goodbye Girl - 1977 - Richard Dreyfuss
  58. Witness - 1985 - Harrison Ford
  59. Morocco - 1930 - Gary Cooper
  60. Double Indemnity - 1944 - Fred MacMurray
  61. Love is a Many Splendored Thing - 1955 - William Holden
  62. Notorious - 1946 - Cary Grant
  63. The Unbearable Lightness of Being - 1988 - Daniel Day-Lewis
  64. The Princess Bride - 1987 - Cary Elwes
  65. Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf? - 1966 - Elizabeth Taylor
  66. The Bridges of Madison County - 1995 - Clint Eastwood
  67. Working Girl - 1988 - Harrison Ford
  68. Porgy and Bess - 1959 - Sidney Potier
  69. Dirty Dancing - 1987 - Jennifer Grey
  70. Body Heat - 1981 - William Hurt
  71. The Lady and the Tramp - 1955 - Peggy Lee
  72. Barefoot in the Park - 1967 - Robert Redford
  73. Grease - 1978 - John Travolta
  74. The Hunchback of Notre Dame - 1939 - Charles Laughton
  75. Pillow Talk - 1959 - Rock Hudson
  76. Jerry Maquire - 1996 - Tom Cruise

The internet is full of movies from romantic films to stop animation lego movies. Films have become a major part of modern society form providing mass entertainment to providing a medium for people to express themselves artistically.

- - -

We Americans love our movies. After all, few places in the world are as important to movie production as Hollywood. But that doesn't mean we're indiscriminate when it comes to movies. If you have children, you don't want to take them to an inappropriate movie.

Besides, it is expensive to go to the movies. Tickets alone can be $8 or more. So we don't want to waste our time and money on a bad movie.

How do you decide if you'll see a movie? You may rely on the advice of friends. Or maybe you follow movie reviews.

But Larry James has a better way for you to find out about all kinds of movies: Rotten Tomatoes. The site gathers movie reviews from a number of sources. So, it is a quick way to get multiple opinions.

The reviews are tallied, so you can see what the average review is. Tired of listening to the experts? Then read the user reviews! You can also read interviews and catch up on movie news.

(A special thanks to Kim Komando for this tip!)

next: Celebrate Love Homepage

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). Top 100 "Romantic" Movies, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/relationships/celebrate-love/top-100-qromanticq-movies

Last Updated: April 27, 2015

Stanton Peele's Curriculum Vitae

Born: January 8, 1946

E-mail: stanton@peele.net

Homepage: http://www.peele.net/

Licensure: New Jersey Psychology License #1368
Member of New Jersey (December, 1997) and New York (March, 1998) Bars

Education:

  • Rutgers University Law School - J.D., May 1997.
  • University of Michigan - Ph.D., social psychology, May 1973.
    Woodrow Wilson, U.S. Public Health, and Ford Foundation Fellowships.
  • University of Pennsylvania - B.A., Political Science, May 1967. Mayor's and State Scholarships, cum laude graduate with distinction in major field, best dissertation in the social sciences (Psychological Aspects of International Conflict).

Awards:

  • The Creation of the Annual Stanton Peele Lecture, 1998, by the Addiction Studies Program, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Alfred Lindesmith Award, 1994, from the Drug Policy Foundation, Washington, DC.
  • Mark Keller Award, 1989, from the Rutgers Center for Alcohol Studies, New Brunswick, NJ.

Current Positions:

  • Adjunct Professor, School of Social Work, New York University. 2003-
  • VIsiting Professor, Bournemouth University, UK. 2003.
  • Addiction consultant. International and national lecturer. 1976-present.
  • Private psychologist, psychological consultant. 1976-present.
  • Private attorney, New Jersey-New York. 1998-present.
  • Pool attorney, Morris County Public Defender's Office. 1998-1999, 2001-2003.
  • Editorial Board, Addiction Research. 1994-2002. Associate Editor. 2002-present.
  • Consultant, Wine Institute, San Francisco, CA. Scientific advisor on encouraging healthy drinking habits. 1994-2001.
  • Consultant, International Center for Alcohol Policies, Washington, DC. Organizing conference on "Alcohol and Pleasure." 1996-1999.
  • Fellow, Drug Policy Alliance. 1994-present.
  • Member, S.M.A.R.T. Recovery International Advisory Council. 1998-present.
  • Board of Directors, Moderation Management. 1994-2000.
  • Consultant, Aetna Insurance Company. 1995-1996.
  • Marketing research consultant, Prudential American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) Division. 1989-1995.
  • Managed care physician satisfaction surveys, HIP/Rutgers Health Plan. 1993-1995.
  • Forensic psychologist. Criminal responsibility, psychiatric and chemical dependence treatment abuses. 1987-present.
  • Advisor, American Psychiatric Association, DSM-IV section on substance abuse. 1992-1993.

Keynote Lectures and Workshops (selected):

    • Minimising the harms of alcohol therapy, Masterclass, Bournemouth University, UK, 2003.
    • Ham reduction therapy, Drug Policy Alliance Biennial Conference, Meadowlands, NJ 2003
    • Pacific Institute of Chemical Dependency, Honolulu, 2002
    • University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Duluth, 2002
    • Haymarket Center's 8th Annual Summer Institute, Chicago, 2002
    • Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association, Chicago, 2002
    • World Forum: Dugs and Dependencies, Montreal, 2002
    • Saskatchewan National Native Addiction Program Proviers, Regina, 2002
    • Trinity College: Addiction Research Centre, Dublin, 2001
    • Measuring Drinking Patterns, Alcohol Problems, and Their Connection, Skarpö, Sweden, 2000
    • 26th Annual Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Oslo, 2000
    • L'Ordre des Psycholgues du Québec, Montreal, 2000
    • Ketile Bruun Society Thematic Merting: Natural History of Addictions, Switzerland, 1999
    • Eastern Regional Health Board of Nova Scotia, Cape Bretton, 1999
    • Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York 1999
    • 25th Annual Epidemiology Symposium of the Kettil Bruun Society, Montreal, 1999
    • Winter School in the Sun, Alcohol and Drug Foundation, Brisbane, Australia, 1998 Stanton, presenting keynote address before Queen Beatrix
    • Inaugural Stanton Peele Lecture, Addiction Studies Program, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia, 1998
    • Union County NCADD, 1996 
    • ICAA Conference on the Prevention and Treatment of Dependencies, Amsterdam, 1996 (top right picture Stanton, presenting keynote address before Queen Beatrix, 1996 ICAA Conference, Amsterdam.)
    • Addictions Forum, Durham, UK, 1996 (right bottom picture, Stanton, delivering keynote address to the Addiction Forum, Durham Castle, 1996.)
    • British Columbia Ministry of Health, Conference on Community-Based Tobacco Reduction Strategies, Vancouver, 1995
    • International Conference on Effects of Different Drinking Patterns, ARF, Toronto, 1995
    • 5th International Conference on the Reduction of Drug Related Harm, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, 1994
    • Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, 1993 

Stanton Addiction Forum 1996

  • 34th Institute on Addiction Studies, McMaster University, 1993 
  • British Columbia Alcohol and Drug Program, Vancouver, 1993
  • 3rd International Conference on the Reduction of Drug Related Harm, Melbourne, 1992
  • XIV World Conference on Therapeutic Communities, Montreal, 1991
  • Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario, 40th Anniversary Conference, 1989
  • Relation de Dépendence et Rupture d'un Couple, Montreal, 1989
  • 26th World Conference on Psychology, Sydney, 1988
  • NIAAA National Conference on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 1988
  • Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies Summer School Alumni Institute, 1982
  • National Conference of the Canadian Addiction Research Foundation, Calgary, 1978

Professional Activities:

  • Program Coordinator, Permission for Pleasure Conference, New York, 1998, under auspices of International Center for Alcohol Policies. 1996-1998.
  • Research consultant, EMRON Health Care Communications, Morris Plains, NJ 07950. Pharmaceutical market research and strategy. 1989-1991.
  • Senior health care consultant, Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., P.O. 2393, Princeton, NJ 08543. Cost-effectiveness research, marketing surveys, etc. 1989-1992.
  • Research Director, Louis Harris and Associates. Project director, Health Care Outlook, syndicated survey of health care trends, 1987-1988.
  • Visiting Lecturer, Rutgers University—taught Drugs and Human Behavior, 1988.
  • Member, Planning Group, Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, to shift focus of program to overall prevention of adolescent substance abuse, 1989.
  • Assistant professor, Harvard Business School- - taught courses in interpersonal dynamics and small group behavior, organizational development, research design and data analysis, September 1971- June 1975.
  • Delphi Expert Prevention Panel, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, 1989.
  • Affiliate Scientist, Alcohol Research Group, Berkeley, CA; Medical Research Institute, San Francisco, 1987-1989.
  • Consultant, editorial and data analysis, Graduate Record Examinations, 1987-1989.
  • Consultant and evaluation specialist, Huntington Drug Abuse Services Project, Youth Bureau Division, Village Green Center, Town of Huntington, NY 11743. 1990-1992.
  • Advisor, Congress of the United States Office of Technology Assessment Study, Adolescent Health. 1990.
  • Contributing editor, Reason, 1989-1993.
  • Associate Editor, Cultural Change Section—American Journal of Health Promotion. 1988-1989.
  • Contributing Editor—Journal of Drug Issues. 1988-1990.
  • Editorial Board, Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1986-1988.
  • Instructor, University of Michigan- - introductory social psychology, January 1969- April 1969, introductory (honors) psychology, January 1971- June 1971.
  • Lecturer, University of California (Berkeley, Davis, Los Angeles, Santa Cruz)- - alcoholism counseling certificate programs, July 1975- August 1976.
  • Consultant, National Institute on Drug Abuse- - Glossary of Drug Terminology, August 1977- June 1979.
  • Visiting associate professor, Pratt Institute (Department Urban and Regional Planning)- - interpersonal behavior, group process, organizational design, September 1977- July 1981.
  • Consultant on drugs and health, John Anderson presidential campaign, July 1980- October 1980.
  • Visiting lecturer, Columbia University Teachers College (Department of Health Education)- - addictions and dependencies, core practicum course, September 1979- May 1980.
  • Columnist, U.S. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Dependence, March 1981- December 1982.
  • Organizational consultant- - corporations, health organizations, small businesses, January 1974- present.
  • Editorial consultant- - journals (American Psychologist, Journal Studies on Alcohol) and publishers (Prentice Hall, Lexington), June 1976- present.
  • Clinical consultant- - King James Addiction Center, Sommerville, NJ, September 1984- 1986.
  • 1995 International Conference on Social and Health Effects of Different Drinking Patterns, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto; 1995 International Conference on the Reduction of Drug-Related Harm, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto; 1994 World Conference of Therapeutic Communities, Montreal; 1994 Brown University Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
  • Participant in the Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies Delphi (Expert) Survey on Alcohol Treatment Practices, 2002.

Publications

Books and Pamphlets

  1. Peele, S., with Brodsky, A. (1975), Love and addiction. New York: Taplinger. New edition, 1991, New York: Penguin USA. Published also — (1) paperback, New York: Signet (New American Library), 1976; 2nd edition, New York: Signet (Penguin USA), 1991; (2) Verslaving aan de liefde, Utrecht: Bruna & Zoon, 1976; (3) London: Sphere Books, 1977. Sections reprinted in (1) Cosmopolitan, August, 1975; (2) K. Low, Prevention (Appendix E), Core knowledge in the drug field, Ottawa: National Health & Welfare, 1978; (3) T.L. Beauchamp, W.T. Blackstone, & J. Feinberg (Eds.), Philosophy and the human condition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980; (4) H. Shaffer & M.E. Burglass (Eds.), Classic contributions in the addictions, New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1981; (5) M. Jay (Ed.), Artificial paradises, London: Penguin, 1999. Reviewed by E. Rapping, The Nation, March 5, 1990, pp. 316-319.
  2. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1977), Addiction is a social disease. Center City, MN: Hazelden, 1977. Originally appeared in Addictions, Winter, 1976, pp. 12-21
  3. Peele, S. (1980), The addiction experience. Center City, MN: Hazelden. (1) Originally appeared in Addictions, Summer-Fall, 1977, pp. 21-41 and 36-57. Reprinted, 1980; (2) as L'experience de l'assuetude, Faculte de L'education Permanente, Universite de Montreal, 1982; (3) in P.J. Baker & L.E. Anderson (Eds.), Social problems: A critical thinking approach, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1987; (4) as revised pamphlet, Tempe, AZ: Do It Now Publications.
  4. Peele, S. (1981), How much is too much: Healthy habits or destructive addictions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Reprinted (2nd ed.) by Human Resources Institute, Morristown, NJ, 1985.
  5. Peele, S. (1983), Don't panic: A parent's guide to understanding and preventing alcohol and drug abuse. Minneapolis: CompCare. Revised and republished, S. Peele & M. Apostolides authors, The Lindesmith Center, New York, 1996.
  6. Peele, S. (1983), The science of experience: A direction for psychology. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
  7. Peele, S. (1984), Self- fulfilling myths of addiction (collection of columns from U.S. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse). Morristown, NJ: Author.
  8. Peele, S. (1985), The meaning of addiction: Compulsive experience and its interpretation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Paperback edition, Lexington, MA: Lexington, 1986. New edition, The meaning of addiction: An unconventional view, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998. (Reviewed by M. Bean-Bayog, New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 1986, 189-190; G. Edwards, British Journal of Addiction, Dec. 1985, pp. 447-448; J. A. Owen, Hospital Formulary, 21, 1986, 1247-1248; M. Gossop, Druglink, Nov./Dec. 1986, p. 17; C. Holden, "An optimist's guide to addiction," Psychology Today, July 1985, pp. 74-75; M. E. Burglass, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, (vol./date unknown), 107-108; C. Tavris, Vogue, Sept. 1985, p. 316.)
  9. Peele, S. (Ed.) (1987), Visions of addiction: Major contemporary perspectives on addiction and alcoholism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. (Reviewed by M. S. Goldman, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 187-188.)
  10. Peele, S. (1989), Diseasing of America: Addiction treatment out of control. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Paperback edition, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1991. Paperback reprinted as Diseasing of America: How we allowed recovery zealots and the treatment industry to convince us we are out of control. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995. (Reviewed by B. G. Orrok, Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1990, 2519-2520; P. M. Roman, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Nov. 1991, pp. 617-618; A. P. Leccese, Psychological Record, 1991, pp. 586-587; "Current disease model of addiction is overstated, expert suggests," Psychiatric News March 6, 1992, p. 13; B. Alexander, Reason, Aug./Sept. 1990, pp. 49-50; J. Wallace, "Review completely refutes author's views and opinions," Sober Times, April 1990, p. 17; L. Troiano, "Addicted states of America," American Health, Sept. 1990, p. 28; S. Bernstein, "Addiction and responsibility," Advertising Age, Apr. 2, 1990; F. Riessman, Self-Help Reporter, Summer/Fall, 1990, pp. 4-5; L. Miller, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 7, 1990, 203-206; D. C. Walsh, "Medicalization run amok?" Health Affairs, Spring 1991, pp. 205-207; W. L. Wilbanks, Justice Quarterly, June 1990, pp. 443-445.) Excerpted in A.T. Rottenberg (Ed.), The structure of argument, Boston: St. Martin's, 1994; in A.T. Rottenberg (Ed.), Elements of argument: A text and reader (4th ed.), Boston: St. Martin's, 1994; in S.O. Lilienfeld (Ed.), Seeing both sides: Classic controversies in abnormal psychology, Pacific Grove: CA: Brooks/Cole, 1995; in J.A. Hurley (Ed.), Addiction: Opposing viewpoints, San Diego, CA: Greenhaven, 1999; in J.D. Torr (Ed.), Alcoholism: Current Controversies San Diego, CA: Greenhaven, pp. 78-82.
  11. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A., with Arnold, M. (1991), The truth about addiction and recovery: The Life Process Program for outgrowing destructive habits. New York: Simon & Schuster. Paperback edition, New York: Fireside, 1992. (Reviewed by M. A. Hubble, Networker, Nov./Dec. 1991, pp. 79-81; B. L. Benderly, American Health, June 1991, p. 89.) Excerpted as "Are people born alcoholics?" in R. Goldberg (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in drugs and society (2nd ed.), Guilford CT: Dushkin, pp. 223-229, 1996.
  12. Peele, S., & Grant, M. (Eds.) (1999), Alcohol and pleasure: A health perspective. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.
  13. Peele, S., Bufe, C., & Brodsky, A. (2000), Resisting 12-step coercion: How to fight forced participation in AA, NA, or 12-step treatment. Tucson, AZ: See Sharp.
  14. Klingemann, H., Sobell, L., Peele, S., et al. (2001), Promoting self-change from problem substance use: Practical implications for policy, prevention and treatment. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
  15. Peele, S. (2004), 7 tools to beat addiction. New York: Random House.

Articles and Book Chapters

  1. Peele, S., & Morse, S.J. (1969), On studying a social movement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 409- 411.
  2. Veroff, J., & Peele, S. (1969), Initial effects of desegregation on the achievement motivation of black elementary school children. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 71- 91.
  3. Morse, S.J., & Peele, S. (1971), A study of participants in an anti- Vietnam War demonstration. Journal of Social Issues, 27, 113- 136.
  4. Peele, S. & Morse, S.J. (1973), The thrill of the chase: A study of achievement motivation and dating behavior. Irish Journal of Psychology, 2, 65- 77.
  5. Morse, S.J., & Peele, S. (1974), "Coloured Power" or "Coloured Bourgeoisie"?: A survey of political attitudes among Coloureds in South Africa. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 317- 334. Runner- up prize in intergroup relations of Society of the Psychological Study of Social Issues. Summarized in Human Behavior, July, 1975.
  6. Peele, S. (1974), The psychology of organizations. In K. Gergen (Ed.), Social psychology: Explorations in understanding. Del Mar, CA: CRM.
  7. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1974, August), Love can be an addiction. Psychology Today, pp. 22- 26. Reprinted — (1) as L'amour peut etre drogue, Psychologie, 1975; (2) in Readings in personality and adjustment, Annual Editions, Guilford, CT: Dushkin, 1978.
  8. Peele, S., & Morse, S.J. (1974), Ethnic voting and political change in South Africa. American Political Science Review, 68, 1520- 1541.
  9. Morse, S.J., & Peele, S. (1975), A socioeconomic and attitudinal comparison of White and Coloured adults in Cape Town. In S.J. Morse & C. Orpen (Eds.), Contemporary South Africa: Social psychological perspectives. Cape Town: Juta.
  10. Morse, S.J., & Peele, S. (1975), The White electorate as a potential source of political change in South Africa: An empirical assessment. In S.J. Morse & C. Orpen (Eds.), Contemporary South Africa: Social psychological perspectives. Cape Town: Juta.
  11. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1975, November), Addicted to food. Life and Health, pp. 18- 21.
  12. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1975), Alcoholism and drug addiction. In R. Stark (Ed.), Social Problems. New York: CRM/Random House.
  13. Peele, S. (1976, April), Review of W. Glasser's "Positive addiction." Psychology Today, p. 36.
  14. Morse, S.J., Gergen, K.J., Peele, S., & van Ryneveld, J. (1977), Reactions to receiving expected and unexpected help from a person who violates or does not violate a norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 397- 402.
  15. Morse, S.J., Peele, S., & Richardson, J. (1977), In- group/out-group perceptions among temporary collectivities: Cape Town's beaches. South African Journal of Psychology, 7, 35- 44.
  16. Peele, S. (1977), Redefining addiction I: Making addiction a scientifically and socially useful concept. International Journal of Health Services, 7, 103- 124.
  17. Peele, S. (1978, September), Addiction: The analgesic experience. Human Nature, pp. 61- 67. Reprinted as Addiction: Relief from life's pains, Washington Post, October 1, 1978, pp. C1, C5.
  18. Peele, S. (1978, August), Is there a solution for addiction? Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Commission. Keynote address to Annual Conference of the Canadian Addiction Research Foundation, Calgary.
  19. Peele, S., & Reising, T. (1978), U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare. In J.L. Bower & C.J. Christenson (Eds.), Public management: Texts and cases, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  20. Peele, S. (1979), Redefining addiction II: The meaning of addiction in our lives. Journal of Psychedelic Drugs, 11, 289- 297.
  21. Peele, S. (1980), Addiction to an experience. American Psychologist, 35, 1047- 1048. (comment)
  22. Peele, S. (1980), Addiction to an experience: A social-psychological- pharmacological theory of addiction. In D.J. Lettieri, M. Sayers, and H.W. Pearson (Eds.), Theories on drug abuse: Selected contemporary perspectives. Rockville, MD: NIDA Research Monograph Series (#30). Reprinted as La dependence a l`egard d'une experience, Psychotropes, 1(1), 80- 84, 1983.
  23. Peele, S. (1981), Reductionism in the psychology of the eighties: Can biochemistry eliminate addiction, mental illness, and pain? American Psychologist, 36, 807- 818.
  24. Peele, S. (1982), Love, sex, drugs, and other magical solutions to life. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 14, 125- 131.
  25. Peele, S. (1982), Why do some people eat until they become fat? American Psychologist, 37, 106. (comment).
  26. Peele, S. (1983), Is alcoholism different from other substance abuse? American Psychologist, 38, 963- 964. (comment)
  27. Peele, S. (1983, September/October), Out of the habit trap: How people cure addictions on their own. American Health, pp. 42-47. Reprinted — (1) as The best way to stop is to stop, Eastern Review, November, 1983; (2) in Health 84/85, Annual Editions, Guilford, CT: Dushkin, 1984; (3) as Hors du piege de l'habitude, Psychotropes, 1(3), 19- 23; (4) in R.S. Lazarus & A. Monat (Eds.), Stress and coping: An anthology (2nd ed.), New York: Columbia University Press, 1985; (5) in W.B. Rucker & M.E. Rucker (Eds.), Drugs society and behavior 86/87, Guilford, CT: Dushkin, 1986; (6) in Best of the first five years of American Health, August, 1987.
  28. Peele, S. (1983, June 26), Disease or defense? Review of G.E. Vaillant's "The natural history of alcoholism." New York Times Book Review, p. 10.
  29. Peele, S. (1983, April), Through a glass darkly: Can some alcoholics learn to drink in moderation? Psychology Today, pp. 38-42. Reprinted — (1) as Au plus profond d'un verre, Psychotropes, 2(1), 23- 26, 1985; (2) in P. Park & W. Matveychuk (Eds.), Culture and politics of drugs, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt, 1986; (3) in W.B. Rucker & M.E. Rucker (Eds.), Drugs society and behavior 86/87, Guilford, CT: Dushkin, 1986.
  30. Peele, S. (1984), The cultural context of psychological approaches to alcoholism: Can we control the effects of alcohol? American Psychologist, 39, 1337- 1351. Reprinted in W.R. Miller (Ed.), Alcoholism: Theory, research, and treatment, Lexington, MA: Gunn, 1985. Excerpted in T. Blake (Ed.), Enduring issues in psychology, San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press, 1995, pp. 173-185.
  31. Peele, S. (1984, September/October), Influencing children's use of drugs: The family's role in values communication. Focus on Family, 1984, pp. 5; 42- 43. Reprinted in Addictive behavior: Drug and alcohol abuse, Englewood, CO: Morton, 1985.
  32. Peele, S. (1984, March/April), The new prohibitionists: Our attitudes toward alcoholism are doing more harm than good. The Sciences, pp. 14-19. Reprinted in R. Pihl (Ed.), Readings in abnormal psychology, Lexington, MA: Gunn, 1984. Summarized in Wilson Quarterly, Summer, 1984.
  33. Peele, S. (1984, December), The question of personality. Psychology Today, pp. 54- 56.
  34. Peele, S. (1984, Spring), Review of R. Hodgson & P. Miller, "Selfwatching: Addictions, habits, compulsions and what to do about them." Druglink, pp. 36- 38.
  35. Peele, S. (1985), Behavior therapy- - the hardest way: Controlled drinking and natural remission from alcoholism. In G.A. Marlatt et al., Abstinence and controlled drinking: Alternative treatment goals for alcoholism and problem drinking? Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 4, 141- 147.
  36. Peele, S. (1985, January/February), Change without pain: How to achieve moderation in an age of excess. American Health, pp. 36- 39. Syndicated as a Washington Post feature.
  37. Peele, S. (1985, September), Does your office have bad habits? American Health, pp. 39- 43.
  38. Peele, S. (1985), The pleasure principle in addiction. Journal of Drug Issues, 15, 193- 201.
  39. Peele, S. (1985), What I would most like to know: How can addiction occur with other than drug involvements? British Journal of Addiction, 80, 23- 25.
  40. Peele, S. (1985), What treatment for addiction can do and what it can't; What treatment for addiction should do and what it shouldn't. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 2, 225- 228.
  41. Peele, S. (1986), The "cure" for adolescent drug abuse: Worse than the problem? Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 23- 24.
  42. Peele, S. (1986), Denial — of reality and freedom — in addiction research and treatment.Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in the Addictive Behaviors, 5, 149-166.
  43. Peele, S. (1986), The dominance of the disease theory in American ideas about and treatment of alcoholism. American Psychologist, 41, 323- 324, 1986. (comment)
  44. Peele, S. (1986), The implications and limitations of genetic models of alcoholism and other addictions. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 63- 73. Reprinted in D.A. Ward (Ed.), Alcoholism: Introduction to theory and treatment (3rd ed.), Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt, 1990, pp. 131-146.
  45. Peele, S. (1986), The life study of alcoholism: Putting drunkenness in biographical context. Bulletin of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 5, 49- 53.
  46. Peele, S. (1986, October), Obsession with fitness: Addiction isn't healthy even when your fix is working out. Sports Fitness, pp. 13-15, 58.
  47. Peele, S. (1986), Personality, pathology, and the act of creation: The case of Alfred Hitchcock.Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 9, 202- 218. Summarized in Wilson Quarterly, New Year's, 1987.
  48. Peele, S. (1986, March), Start making sense: If you want to think straight about drugs and ball players, forget about the so-called truths. Sports Fitness, pp. 48-50, 77-78.
  49. Peele, S. (1987), The disease theory of alcoholism from an interactionist perspective: The consequences of self-delusion. Drugs & Society, 2, 147-170. Republished in book form, in B. Segal, Perspectives on personality-environment interaction and drug-taking behavior, New York: Haworth Press, 1987, pp. 147-170.
  50. Peele, S. (1987), Introduction: The nature of the beast. Journal of Drug Issues, 17, 1-7. Republished in S. Peele, (Ed.), Visions of addiction, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1987.
  51. Peele, S. (1987), The limitations of control-of-supply models for explaining and preventing alcoholism and drug addiction. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48, 61-77. Excerpted in Brown University Digest of Addiction Theory and Application, 6, 46-48, 1987. Awarded 1989 Mark Keller Award for best article in JSA, 1987-1988.
  52. Peele, S. (1987), A moral vision of addiction: How people's values determine whether they become and remain addicts. Journal of Drug Issues, 17, 187-215. Republished in S. Peele (Ed.), Visions of addiction, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1987.
  53. Peele, S. (1987), What does addiction have to do with level of consumption? A response to R. Room. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48: 84-89. Excerpted in Brown University Digest of Addiction Theory and Application, 6, 52-54, 1987.
  54. Peele, S. (1987, Jan-Feb), Review of J. Orford, "Excessive appetites: A psychological view of the addictions." Druglink, p. 16.
  55. Peele, S. (1987), Review of Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism, by H. Blane and K. Leonard (Eds.). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 1, 120-125.
  56. Peele, S. (1987), Running scared: We're too frightened to deal with the real issues in adolescent substance abuse. Health Education Research, 2, 423-432.
  57. Peele, S. (1987), What can we expect from treatment for adolescent drug and alcohol abuse?Pediatrician, 14, 62-69.
  58. Peele, S. (1987), Why do controlled-drinking outcomes vary by country, era, and investigator?: Cultural conceptions of relapse and remission in alcoholism. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 20, 173-201.
  59. Levitt, S. & Peele, S. (1988, July), Training together: How to have a good time in an unequal partnership. Sports Fitness, pp. 80-83, 107-108.
  60. Peele, S. (1988, September), Are psychology and addictionology disparate activities? Invited address, 26th World Congress on Psychology, Sydney, Australia.
  61. Peele, S. (1988), Can we treat away our alcohol and drug problems or is the current treatment binge doing more harm than good? Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 20(4), 375-383.
  62. Peele, S. (1988), Fools for love: The romantic ideal, psychological theory, and addictive love. In R.J. Sternberg & M.L. Barnes (Eds.), The anatomy of love, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 159-188.
  63. Peele, S. (1988), How strong is the steel trap? (Review of The steel drug: Cocaine in perspective), Contemporary Psychology, 33, 144-145.
  64. Peele, S. (1988), The single greatest antidote to and preventative for addiction. In W. Swift & J. Greeley (Eds.), The future of the addiction model, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia: National Drug & Alcohol Research Centre, pp. 11-21. Excerpted in Druglink, Nov./Dec., 1992, p. 14.
  65. Peele, S. (1989, July/August), Ain't misbehavin': Addiction has become an all-purpose excuse.The Sciences, pp. 14-21. Translated (Dutch) in Psychologie, February, 1991, pp. 31-33; Reprinted in R. Atwan (Ed.), Our Times/2, Boston: Beford, 405-416.
  66. Peele, S. (1990), Addiction as a cultural concept. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 602, 205-220.
  67. Peele, S. (1990), Behavior in a vacuum: Social-psychological theories of addiction that deny the social and psychological meanings of behavior. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11, 513-530.
  68. Peele, S. (1990, February), "Control yourself." Reason, pp. 23-25. Reprinted as "Does addiction excuse thieves and killers from criminal responsibility?" in A.S. Trebach & K.B. Zeese (Eds.), Drug policy: A reformer's catalogue, Washington, DC: Drug Policy Foundation, 1989, pp. 201-207; International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 13, 95-101, 1990. Excerpted in Washington Post, January 17, 1990, p. A20.
  69. Peele, S. (1990, July), The new thalidomide (drinking and pregnancy). Reason, pp. 41-42.
  70. Peele, S. (1990), Personality and alcoholism: Establishing the link. In D.A. Ward (Ed.), Alcoholism: Introduction to theory and treatment (3rd ed.), Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt, 1990, pp. 131-146.
  71. Peele, S. (1990), Research issues in assessing addiction treatment efficacy: How cost effective are Alcoholics Anonymous and private treatment centers? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 25, 179-182.
  72. Peele, S. (1990, August), Second thoughts about a gene for alcoholism. The Atlantic, pp. 52-58. Translated (Russian) in America Illustrated (Washington, DC: U.S. Information Agency), 1990; reprinted in California Prevention Network Journal, Fall 1990, pp. 30-36; in K.G. Duffy (Ed.), Personal Growth and Behavior (Guilford, CT: Dushkin), 1991, pp. 78-83; in E. Goode, Drugs, Society, and Behavior, (Guilford, CT: Dushkin), 1991, pp. 84-89.
  73. Peele, S. (1990), A values approach to addiction: Drug policy that is moral rather than moralistic. Journal of Drug Issues, 20, 639-646.
  74. Peele, S. (1990), Why and by whom the American alcoholism treatment industry is under siege. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 22, 1-13.
  75. Brodsky, A. & Peele, S. (1991, November), AA Abuse (coerced treatment). Reason, pp. 34-39.
  76. Peele, S. (1991, December), Asleep at the switch (random drug testing of transportation workers). Reason, pp. 63-65.
  77. Peele, S. (1991), Commentary on "The lay treatment community," in P.E. Nathan et al. (Eds.), Annual Review of Addictions Research and Treatment (New York: Pergamon), pp. 387-388.
  78. Peele, S. (1991, August/September), Getting away with murder (the battered-woman defense). Reason, pp. 40-41.
  79. Peele, S. (1991), Herbert Fingarette, radical revisionist: Why are people so upset with this retiring philosopher? In M. Bockover (ed.), Rules, Rituals, and Responsibility (Chicago: Open Court), pp. 37-53.
  80. Peele, S. (1991, April), Mad lib (review of Madness in the Streets and Out of Bedlam). Reason, pp. 53-55.
  81. Peele, S. (1991, May), Smoking: Cold turkey (quitting smoking). Reason, pp. 54-55.
  82. Peele, S. (1991, December), What we now know about treating alcoholism and other addictions . Harvard Mental Health Letter, pp. 5-7, reprinted in R. Hornby (Ed.), Alcohol and Native Americans (Rosebud, SD: Sinte Gleska University), pp. 91-94
  83. Peele, S. (1991), What works in addiction treatment and what doesn't: Is the best therapy no therapy? International Journal of the Addictions, 25, 1409-1419.
  84. Peele, S., & Brodsky, A. (1991, February), What's up to doc? (Coerced medical treatment). Reason, pp. 34-36.
  85. Peele, S. (1992, March), The bottle in the gene. Review of Alcohol and the Addictive Brain, by Kenneth Blum, with James E. Payne. Reason, 51-54.
  86. Peele, S. (1992), Alcoholism, politics, and bureaucracy: The consensus against controlled-drinking therapy in America. Addictive Behaviors, 17, 49-62.
  87. Peele, S. (1992) Why is everybody always pickin' on me: A response to comments. Addictive Behaviors, 17, 83-93.
  88. Peele, S. (1992), Challenging the traditional addiction concepts (Images of addiction and self-control). In P. A. Vamos & P. J. Corriveau (Eds.), Drugs and society to the year 2000 (Montreal: Proceedings of the XIV World Conference on Therapeutic Communities), pp. 251-262.
  89. Peele, S. (1992, Oct/Nov), The diseased society. Journal (Ontario Addiction Research Foundation), pp. 7-8.
  90. Peele, S. et al. (1992), Contraceptive pharmacoeconomics: A roundtable discussion. Medical Interface, Supplement.
  91. Peele, S. (1993), The conflict between public health goals and the temperance mentality.American Journal of Public Health, 83, 805-810. Reprinted as "Should moderate alcohol consumption be encouraged?" in R. Goldberg (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in drugs and society (2nd ed.), Guilford CT: Dushkin, pp. 150-159, 1996.
  92. Peele, S. (1994, Feb), Cost-effective treatments for substance abuse: Avoid throwing the baby out with the bath water. Medical Interface, pp. 78-84.
  93. Harburg, E., Gleiberman, L., DiFranceisco, W., & Peele, S. (1994), Towards a concept of sensible drinking and an illustration of measurement. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 29, 439-50.
  94. Peele, S. (1994, November 7), Hype overdose. The mainstream press automatically accepts reports of heroin overdoses, no matter how thin the evidence. National Review, pp. 59-60.
  95. Peele, S. (1995), Abstinence versus controlled drinking. In Jaffe, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Drugs and Alcohol (New York: Macmillan), p. 92.
  96. Peele, S. (1995), Controlled drinking vs. abstinence. In Jaffe, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Drugs and Alcohol (New York: Macmillan), pp. 92-97.
  97. Peele, S. (1995), Existential causes of drug abuse. In Jaffe, J. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Drugs and Alcohol (New York: Macmillan).
  98. Peele, S. & DeGrandpre, R.J. (1995, July/August), My genes made me do it: Debunking current genetic myths. Psychology Today, pp. 50-53, 62-68. Reprinted in M.R. Merrens & G.G. Brannigan (Eds.), Experiences in personality: Research, assessment, and change, New York: Wiley, 1998, pp. 119-126; excerpted in CQ (Congressional Quarterly) Researcher, Biology and behavior: How much do our genes drive the way we act?, April 3, 1998, 8(13), p. 305.
  99. Peele, S. (1995), Culture, alcohol, and health: The consequences of alcohol consumption among western nations, paper presented at International Conference on Social and Health Effects of Different Drinking Patterns, Toronto, Ontario, November 13-17.
  100. Peele, S. (1996, March/April), Telling children all drinking is bad is simply not true. Healthy Drinking.
  101. Peele, S. (1996, April), Getting wetter?: Signs of a shift in attitudes towards alcohol. Reason, pp. 58-61. Reprinted in J.D. Torr (Ed.), Alcoholism: Current Controversies San Diego, CA: Greenhaven, pp. 44-49.
  102. Peele, S. (1996), Should physicians recommend alcohol to their patients?: Yes. Priorities, 8(1): 24-29.
  103. Peele, S. (1996), Assumptions about drugs and the marketing of drug policies. In W.K. Bickel & R.J. DeGrandpre (Eds.), Drug policy and human nature: Psychological perspectives on the prevention, management, and treatment of illicit drug abuse. New York: Plenum, pp. 199-220.
  104. Peele, S. (1996, September/October), Recovering from an all-or-nothing approach to alcohol. Psychology Today, pp. 35-43, 68-70.
  105. Peele, S. & Brodsky, A. (1996), The antidote to alcohol abuse: Sensible drinking messages. In A.L. Waterhouse & J.M. Rantz (Eds.), Wine in context: Nutrition, physiology, policy (proceedings of the Symposium on Wine & Health 1996). Davis, CA: American Society for Enology and Viticulture, pp. 66-70.
  106. Peele, S. & Brodsky, A. (1996), Alcohol and society: How culture influences the way people drink. San Francisco: Wine Institute.
  107. Peele, S. (1996), The reults for drug reform goals of shifting from interdiction/punishment to treatment, PsychNews International, 1(6) (presented at 10th International Conference on Drug Policy Reform, Washington, DC, Nov. 6-9).
  108. Peele, S. (1996), Introduction to Audrey Kishline's Moderate drinking: The Moderation Management guide for people who want to reduce their drinking. New York: Crown.
  109. Peele, S. (1997), Utilizing culture and behaviour in epidemiological models of alcohol consumption and consequences for Western nations. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 32, 51-64.
  110. Peele, S. (1997, May-June), Bait and switch in project MATCH; What NIAAA research actually shows about alcohol treatment. In PsychNews International, Vol. 2.
  111. Peele, S. (1997), R. Brinkley Smithers: The financier of the modern alcoholism movement. Amsterdam: The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.
  112. Peele, S. (1997), A brief history of the National Council on Alcoholism through pictures. Amsterdam: The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.
  113. Peele, S. (1997), Introduction to Ken Ragge's The real AA. In: Ken Ragge, The Real AA. Tucson, AZ: See Sharp Press.
  114. Peele, S. (1997, August 11), Alcoholic denial. The government's prejudice against alcohol is a hangover from Prohibition. National Review, pp. 45-46. Reprinted in W. Dudley (Ed.), Opposing viewpoints in social issues, San Diego, CA: Greenhaven.
  115. Peele, S. (1997, November 11), Making excuses. Betrayed men and battered women get away with murder. National Review, pp. 50-51.
  116. Peele, S. (1998), Introduction to Charles Bufe's AA: Cult or cure?. Tucson, AZ: See Sharp Press.
  117. Peele, S. & Brodsky, A. (1998), Gateway to nowhere: How alcohol came to be scapegoated for drug abuse. Addiction Research, 5, 419-426.
  118. Peele, S. (1998, March/April), All wet: The gospel of abstinence and twelve-step, studies show, is leading American alcoholics astray. The Sciences, pp. 17-21.
  119. Peele, S. (1998, Spring), Ten radical things NIAAA research shows about alcoholism. The Addictions Newsletter (The American Psychological Association, Division 50) (Vol 5, No. 2), pp. 6; 17-19.
  120. Peele, S. & DeGrandpre, R.J. (1998), Cocaine and the concept of addiction: Environmental factors in drug compulsions. Addiction Research, 6, 235-263.
  121. Husak, D., & Peele, S. (1998), "One of the major problems of our society": Symbolism and evidence of drug harms in U.S. Supreme Court decisions. Contemporary Drug Problems, 25, 191-233.
  122. Peele, S. (1999), The fix is in: A commentary on The fix (Massing, 1998) and "An informed approach to substance abuse" (Kleiman, 1998). International Journal of Drug Policy, 10, 9-16.
  123. Peele, S. (1999), Is sex really addictive? Review of Sexual addiction: An inegrated approach. Contemporary Psychology, 44, 154-156.
  124. Peele, S. (1999), Introduction. In S. Peele & M. Grant (Eds.), Alcohol and pleasure: A health perspective. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel, pp. 1-7.
  125. Brodsky, A., & Peele, S. (1999), Psychosocial benefits of moderate alcohol consumption: Alcohol's role in a broader conception of health and well-being. In S. Peele & M. Grant (Eds.), Alcohol and pleasure: A health perspective. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel, pp. 187-207.
  126. Peele, S. (1999), Promoting positive drinking: Alcohol, necessary evil or positive good? In S. Peele & M. Grant (Eds.), Alcohol and pleasure: A health perspective. Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel, pp. 375-389.
  127. Peele, S. (1999, August), The persistent, dangerous myth of heroin overdose. DPFT News (Drug Policy Forum of Texas), p. 5.
  128. Peele, S. (1999, October), Bottle battle (conflict over labels on alcoholic beverages and U.S. Dietary Guideliness). Reason, pp. 52-54.
  129. Peele, S. (1999), Foreword. In: R. Granfield & W. Cloud, Coming clean: Overcoming addiction without treatment. New York City: NYU Press, pp. ix-xii.
  130. Peele, S. (1999, May 12), Growing heroin use among the young and affluent? New York Times.
  131. Peele, S. (2000, Summer), Sex, drugs and dependency: When does too much of a good thing become a 'behavioural disease'? Last Magazine, p. 56.
  132. Peele, S. (2000), The road to hell. Review of Mental hygiene: Classroom films — 1945-1970. International Journal of Drug Policy, 11, 245-250.
  133. Peele, S. (2000), Foreword to Rebecca Fransway's 12-step horror stories: True tales of misery, betrayal and abuse. Tucson, AZ: See Sharp Press.
  134. Peele, S. (2000, November), After the crash. Reason, pp. 41-44.
  135. Peele, S., & A. Brodsky (2000), Exploring psychological benefits associated with moderate alcohol use: A necessary corrective to assessments of drinking outcomes? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 60, 221-247.
  136. Peele, S. (2000), What addiction is and is not: The impact of mistaken notions of addiction. Addiction Research, 8, 599-607.
  137. Peele, S. (2001, Winter), Court-ordered treatment for drug offenders is much better than prison: Or is it? Reconsider Quarterly, pp. 20-23.
  138. Peele, S. (2001), Is gambling an addiction like drug and alcohol addiction? Developing realistic and useful conceptions of compulsive gambling. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling, [On-line serial], 1(3).
  139. Peele, S. (2001, February), The new consensus—"Treat 'em or jail 'em" —is worse than the old. DPFT News (Drug Policy Forum of Texas), pp. 1; 3-4.
  140. Peele, S. (2001, May), Drunk with power. The case against court-imposed 12-step treatments. Reason, pp. 34-38.
  141. Peele, S. (2001), Whose spirits have been broken anyway? Review of Broken spirits: Power and ideas in Nordic alcohol control. Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift, 18(1), 106-110.
  142. Peele, S. (2001), Will the Internet encourage or combat addiction? Review of Telematic Drug and Alcohol Prevention: Guidelines and Experience from Prevnet Euro. Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift, 18(1), 114-118.
  143. Peele, S. (2001, July/August), The world as addict. Review of Forces of habit: Drugs and the making of the modern world, by D.E. Courtwright. Psychology Today, p. 72.
  144. Peele, S. (2001, Summer), Change is natural. This is why therapists and helpers must embrace natural processes. SMART Recovery News & Views , pp. 7-8.
  145. Peele, S. (2001, May), The end of drunkenness? International Center for Alcohol Policies, Website: Invited Opinion , May, 2001 < http://www.icap.org > (reprinted with permission).
  146. Peele, S. (2001), American Heart Association advisory, "Wine and Your Heart," is not science-based . Circulation , 104 , e73.
  147. Peele, S. (2001, February), Is gambling an addiction like alcohol and drug addiction?: Developing realistic and useful conceptions of compulsive gambling. Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling 3 [online], http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue3/feature/index.html. Reprinted in G. Reith (Ed.), Gambling: Who wins? Who loses? Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
  148. Peele, S. (2002, May), Hungry for the next fix. Behind the relentless, misguided search for a medical cure for addiction . Reason , pp. 32-36. Reprinted in H.T. Wilson (ed.), Drugs, society, and behavior, Dubuque, IA: Dushkin, 2004, pp. 28-34.
  149. Peele, S. (2002, Spring), Moral entrepreneurs and truth . Smart Recovery News & Views , pp. 8-9.
  150. Peele, S. (2002, Summer), What is harm reduction and how do I practice it? SMART Recovery News & Views , pp. 5-6.
  151. Peele, S. (2002, August), Harm reduction in clinical practice. Counselor: The Magazine for Addiction Professionals , pp. 28-32.
  152. Peele, S. (2003, Winter). What I discovered among the aboriginals. SMART Recovery News & Views, pp. 5-6.
  153. Peele, S. (2003, Spring), The best and the worst of 2002. SMART Recovery News & Views, pp. 5-6.
  154. Peele, S. (2004), The crack baby myth can itself be damaging. The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.
  155. Peele, S. (2004), Prescribed addiction, in J. Schaler (Ed.), Szasz under fire, Chicago: Open Court Press.
  156. Peele, S. (2004, May-June). The surprising truth about addition. Psychology Today, pp. 43-46.
  157. Peele, S. (2004, July-August). Is AA's loss psychology's gain? Monitor on Psychology (American Psychology Association), p. 86.
  158. Peele, S. (2005, October), Combating the Addictogenic Culture. The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.
  159. Peele, S. (2006, January), Marijuana Is Addictive - So What? The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.
  160. Peele, S., & A. McCarley (2006, February), James Frey Told One Essential Truth. The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.
  161. Peele, S., & A. McCarley (2006, February), James Frey's One True Thing. The Stanton Peele Addiction Website.

Newspaper Articles

  1. Nonrevealing revelations, Bergen Record, June l3, l979 — autobiographical accounts like Betty Ford's reveal less than they pretend to.
  2. Scared crooked, Bergen Record, February 8, l980 — scaring the pants off kids doesn't prevent crime or anything else.
  3. How we ended crime, Bergen Record, March 20, l98l — by redefining it all as "illness."
  4. The special trauma for Jews of Lebanon invasion, Bergen Record, December 24, l982 — liberal Jews increasingly identify with conservative positions.
  5. Bringing up baby in a changing society, Daily Record (Morristown), November l7, l984 — how sex roles have both changed and remained the same.
  6. Battered wives: Love and murder, Los Angeles Times, November 28, l984— how psychological explanations can increase family violence.
  7. Harsh penalties for drunk driving may miss target, Los Angeles Times, June l9, l985 — let's get the killers in jail while remonstrating social drinkers.
  8. Ballplayers put a twist on drug 'truths,' Los Angeles Times, October l8, l985 — revelations at ballplayers' drug trial differ from accepted wisdom.
  9. Cures depend on attitude, not programs, Los Angeles Times, March 14, 1990—people become addicted to fill needs that are better filled when they cope better.
  10. What O.J.'s letter didn't say, Los Angeles Times, June 24, 1994 —self-referential letter tends more to prove guilt, not innocence.
  11. Tell children the truth about drinking, Los Angeles Times, March 1, 1996. Reprinted in J.A. Hurley (Ed.), Addiction: Opposing viewpoints, San Diego, CA: Greenhaven, 1999.
  12. Don't reward what doesn't work, Addiction: Harvard honors the U.S. drug czar and others for pursuing failed treatments, Are we ready for contrary messages? Los Angeles Times, January 26, 1997.
  13. Send in the clones, Wall Street Journal, March 3, 1997, p. A18.
  14. Cloning Hitler and Einstein, Daily Record (Morris County, NJ), April 13, 1997, Opinion p. 1.
  15. Should we continue to wage the drug war? Chasing the dragon, New York Times (Letters), April 14, 1997, p. A16.
  16. Golfer can't blame all his problems on drinking, Daily Record (Morris County, New Jersey), August 22, 1997, p. A19.
  17. Alcoholism and the elderly — The new epidemic? The Star Ledger (Newark), July 29, 1998, p. A19.
  18. McCain has two standards on drug abuse: The GOP candidate is a hawk in the drug war, yet his wife got no penalty, Los Angeles Times, February 14, 2000, p. B5.
  19. Everything in moderation. The debate over alcohol: Is one too many? Star Ledger (New Jersey), August 13, 2000, p. 1 (Perspective Section).
  20. Downey's relapse no surprise. Daily Record (Morris County, NJ), Friday, December 10, 2001.
  21. Why no reduction in depression in America? Hartford Courant, July 7, 2003.
  22. Can we cure drug addiction with drug treatments? Response to A. O'Connor, "New ways to loosen addiction's grip," New York Times, August 3, 2004, pp. F1, F6.
  23. Author's true milestone lost in controversy. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, February 2, 2006.

next: Ten Radical Things NIAAA Research Shows About Alcoholism
~ all Stanton Peele articles
~ addictions library articles
~ all addictions articles

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). Stanton Peele's Curriculum Vitae, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/addictions/articles/stanton-peeles-curriculum-vitae

Last Updated: June 28, 2016

Working With Others

Letting people help with your alcoholism, For sufferers, survivors of alcoholism, drug abuse, substance abuse, gambling, other addictions. Expert information, addictions support groups, chat, journals, and support lists.Practical experience shows that nothing will so much insure immunity from drinking as intensive work with other alcoholics. It works when other activities fail. This is our Twelfth Suggestion: Carry this message to other alcoholics! You can help when no one else can. You can secure their confidence when others fail. Remember they are very ill.

Life will take on new meaning. To watch people recover, to see them help others, to watch loneliness vanish, to see a fellowship grow up about you, to have a host of friends this is an experience you must not miss. We know you will not want to miss it. Frequent contact with newcomers and with each other is the bright spot of our lives.

Perhaps you are not acquainted with any drinkers who want to recover. You can easily find some by asking a few doctors, ministers, priests, or hospitals. They will be only too glad to assist you. Don't start out as an evangelist or a reformer. Unfortunately a lot of prejudice exists. You will be handicapped if you arouse it. Ministers and doctors are competent and you can learn much from them if you wish, but it happens that because of your own drinking experience you can be uniquely useful to other alcoholics. So cooperate; never criticize. To be helpful is our only aim.

When you discover a prospect for Alcoholics Anonymous, find out all you can about him. If he does not want to stop drinking, don't waste time trying to persuade him. You may spoil a later opportunity. This advice is given for his family also. They should be patient, realizing they are dealing with a sick person.

If there is any indication that he wants to stop, have a good talk with the person most interested in him usually his wife. Get an idea of his behavior, his problems, his background, the seriousness of his condition, and his religious leanings. You need to know this information to put yourself in his place, to see how you would like him to approach you if the tables were turned.

Sometimes it is wise to wait till he goes on a binge. The family may object to this, but unless he is in a dangerous physical condition, it is better to risk it. Don't deal with him when he is very drunk, unless he is ugly and the family needs your help. Wait for the end of the spree, or at least for a lucid interval. Then let his family or a friend ask him if he wants to quit for good and if he would go to any extreme to do so. If he says yes, then his attention should be drawn to you as a person who has recovered. You should be described to him as one of a fellowship who, as part of their own recovery, try to help others and who will be glad to talk to him if he cares to see you.

If he does not want to see you, never force yourself upon him. Neither should the family hysterically plead with him to do anything, nor should they tell him much about you. They should wait for the end of his next drinking bout. You might place this book where he can see it in the interval. Here no specific rule can be given. The family must decide these things. But urge them not to be overanxious, for that might spoil matters.

Usually the family should not try to tell your story. When possible, avoid meeting a man through his family. Approach through a doctor or an institution is a better bet. If your man needs hospitalization, he should have it, but not forcibly unless he is violent. Let the doctor, if he will, tell him he has something in the way of a solution.

When your man is better, the doctor might suggest a visit from you. Though you have talked with the family, leave them out of the first discussion. Under these conditions your prospect will see he is under no pressure. He will feel he can deal with you without being nagged by his family. Call on him while he is still jittery. He may be more receptive when depressed.

See your man alone, if possible. At first engage in general conversation. After a while, turn the talk to some phase of drinking. Tell him enough about your drinking habits, symptoms, and experiences to encourage him to speak of himself. If he wishes to talk, let him do so. You will thus get a better idea of how you ought to proceed. If he is not communicative, give him a sketch of your drinking career up to the time you quit. But say nothing at the moment of how that was accomplished. If he is in a serious mood, dwell on the troubles liquor has caused you, being careful not to moralize or lecture. If his mood is light, tell him humorous stories of y our escapades. Get him to tell some of his.

When he sees you know all about the drinking game, commence to describe yourself as an alcoholic. Tell him how baffled you were, how you finally learned that you were sick. Give him an account of the struggles you made to stop. Show him the mental twist which leads to the first drink of a spree. We suggest you do this as we have done it in the chapter on alcoholism. If he is alcoholic, he will understand you at once. He will match your mental inconsistencies with some of his own.

If you are satisfied that he is a real alcoholic, begin to dwell on the hopeless feature of the malady. Show him, from your own experience, how the queer mental condition surrounding that first drink prevents normal functioning of the will power. Don't, at this stage, refer to this book, unless he has seen it and wishes to discuss it. And be careful not to brand him as an alcoholic. Let him draw his own conclusion. If he sticks to the idea that he can still control his drinking, tell him that possibly he can if he is not too alcoholic. But insist that if he is severely afflicted, there may be little chance he can recover by himself.


Continue to speak of alcoholism as an illness, a fatal malady. Talk about the conditions of body and mind which accompany it. Keep his attention focused mainly on your personal experience. Explain that many are doomed who never realize their predicament. Doctors are rightly loath to tell alcoholic patients the whole story unless it will serve some good purpose. But you may talk to him about the hopelessness of alcoholism because you offer a solution. You will soon have your friend admitting he has many, if not all, of the traits of the alcoholic. If his own doctor is willing to tell him he is alcoholic, so much the better. Even though your protégé may not have entirely admitted his condition, he has become very curious to know how you got well. Let him ask you that question, if he will. Tell him exactly what happened to you. Stress the spiritual feature freely. If the man be agnostic or atheist, make it emphatic that he does not have to agree with your conception of God. He can choose any conception he likes, provided it makes sense to him. The main thing is that he be willing to believe in a Power greater than himself and that he live by spiritual principles.

When dealing with such a person, you had better use everyday language to describe spiritual principles. There is no use arousing any prejudice he may have against certain theological terms and conceptions about which he may already be confused. Don't raise such issues, no matter what your own convictions are.

Your prospect may belong to a religious denomination. His religious education and training may be far superior to yours. In that case he is going to wonder how you can add anything to what he already knows. But he will be curious to learn why his own convictions have not worked and why yours seem to work so well. He may be an example of the truth that faith alone is insufficient. To be vital, faith must be accompanied by self sacrifice and unselfish, constructive action. Let him see that you are not there to instruct him in religion. Admit that he probably knows more about it than you do, but call to his attention the fact that however deep his faith and knowledge, he could not have applied it or he would not drink. Perhaps your story will help him see where he has failed to practice the very precepts he knows so well. We represent no particular faith or denomination. We are dealing only with general principles common to most denominations.

Outline the program of action, explaining how you made a self appraisal, how you straightened out your past and why you are now endeavoring to be helpful to him. It is important to him to realize that your attempt to pass this on to him plays a vital part in your own recovery. Actually, he may be helping you more than you are helping him. Make it plain he is under no obligation to you, that you hope only that he will try to help other alcoholics when he escapes his own difficulties. Suggest how important it is that he place the welfare of other people ahead of his own. Make it clear that he is under no pressure, that he needn't see you again if he doesn't want to. You should not be offended if he wants to call it off, for he has helped you more than you have helped him. If your talk has been sane, quiet and full of human understanding, you have perhaps made a friend. Maybe you have disturbed him about the question of alcoholism. This is all to the good. The more hopeless he feels, the better. He will be more likely to follow your suggestions.

Your candidate may give reasons why he need not follow all of the program. He may rebel at the thought of drastic housecleaning which requires discussion with other people. Do not contradict such views. Tell him you once felt as he does, but you doubt whether you would have made much progress had you not taken action. On your first visit, tell him about the Fellowship of Alcoholics Anonymous. If he shows interest, lend him your copy of this book.

Unless your friend wants to talk further about himself, do not wear out your welcome. Give him a chance to think it over. If you do stay, let him steer the conversation in any direction he likes. Sometimes a new man is anxious to proceed at once, and you may be tempted to let him do so. This is sometimes a mistake. If he has trouble later, he is likely to say you rushed him. You will be most successful with alcoholics if you do not exhibit any passion for crusade or reform. Never talk down to an alcoholic from any moral or spiritual hilltop; simply lay out the kit of spiritual tools for his inspection. Show him friendship and fellowship. Tell him that if he wants to get well you will do anything to help.

If he is not interested in your solution, if he expects you to act only as a banker for his financial difficulties or a nurse for his sprees, you may have to drop him until he changes his mind. This he may do after he gets hurt some more.

If he is sincerely interested and wants to see you again, ask him to read this book in the interval. After doing that, he must decide for himself whether he wants to go on. He should not be pushed or prodded by you, his wife, or his friends. If he is to find God, the desire must come from within.

If he thinks he can do the job in some other way, or prefers some other spiritual approach, encourage him to follow his own conscience. We have no monopoly on God; we merely have an approach that worked with us. But point out that we alcoholics have much in common and that you would like, in any case, to be friendly. Let it go at that.


Do not be discourage if your prospect does not respond at once. Search out another alcoholic and try again. You are sure to find someone desperate enough to accept with eagerness what you offer. We find it a waste of time to keep chasing a man who cannot or will not work with you. If you leave such a person alone, he may soon become convinced that he cannot recover by himself. To spend too much time on any one situation is to deny some other alcoholic an opportunity to live and be happy. One of our Fellowship failed entirely with his first half dozen prospects. He often says that if he had continued to work on them, he might have deprived many others, who have since recovered, of their chance.

Suppose now you are making your second visit to a man. He has read this volume and says he is prepared to go through with the Twelve Steps of the program of recovery. Having had the experience yourself, you can give him much practical advice. Let him know you are available if he wishes to make a decision and tell his story, but do not insist upon it if he prefers to consult someone else.

He may be broke and homeless. If he is, you might try to help him about getting a job, or give him a little financial assistance. But you should not deprive your family or creditors of money they should have. Perhaps you will take the man into your home for a few days. But be sure to use discretion. Be certain that he will be welcomed by our family, and that he is not trying to impose upon you for money, connections, or shelter. Permit that and you only harm him. You will be making it possible for him to be insincere. You may be aiding in his destruction rather than his recovery.

Never avoid these responsibilities, but be sure you are doing the right thing if you assume them. Helping others is the foundation stone of your recovery. A kindly act once in a while isn't enough. You have to act the Good Samaritan every day, if need be. It may mean the loss of many nights' sleep, great interference with your pleasures, interruptions to your business. It may mean sharing your money and your home, counseling frantic wives and relatives, innumerable trips to the police courts, sanitariums, hospitals, jails, and asylums. Your telephone may jangle at any time of the day or night. A drunk may smash the furniture in your home or burn a mattress. You may have to fight with him if he is violent. Sometimes you will have to call a doctor and administer sedatives under his direction. Another time you may have to send for the police or an ambulance. Occasionally you will have to meet such conditions.

We seldom allow an alcoholic to live in our homes for long at a time. It is not good for him, and it sometimes creates serious complications in a family.

Though an alcoholic does not respond, there is no reason why you should neglect his family. You should continue to be friendly to them. The family should be offered your way of life. Should they accept and practice spiritual principles, there is a much better chance that the head of the family will recover. And even though he continues to drink, the family will find life more bearable.

For the type of alcoholic who is able and willing to get well, little charity, in the ordinary sense of the word, is needed or wanted. The men who cry for money and shelter before conquering alcohol, are on the wrong track. Yet we do go to great extremes to provide each other with these very things, when such action is warranted. This may seem inconsistent, but we think it is not.

It is not the matter of giving that is in question, but when and how to give. That often makes the difference between failure and success. The minute we put our work on a service plane, the alcoholic commences to rely upon our assistance rather than upon God. He clamors for this or for that, claiming he cannot master alcohol until his material needs are cared for. Nonsense. Some of us have taken very hard knocks to learn this truth: Job or no job wife or no wife we simply do not stop drinking so long as we place dependence upon other people ahead of dependence on God.

Burn the idea into the consciousness of every man that he can get well regardless of anyone. The only condition is that he trust in God and clean house.

Now, the domestic problem: There may be divorce, separation, or just strained relations. When your prospect has made such preparation as he can to his family, and has thoroughly explained to them the new principles by which he is living, he should proceed to put these principles into action at home. That is, if he is lucky enough to have a home. Thought his family be at fault in many respects, he should not be concerned about that. He should concentrate on his own spiritual demonstration. Argument and faultfinding are to be avoided like the plague. In many homes this is a difficult thing to do, but it must be done if any results are to be expected. If persisted in for a few months, the effect on a man's family is sure to be great. The most incompatible people discover they have a basis upon which they can meet. Little by little the family may see their own defects and admit them. These can then be discussed in an atmosphere of helpfulness and friendliness.

After they have seen tangible results, the family will perhaps want to go along. These things will come to pass naturally and in good time provided, however, the alcoholic continues to demonstrate that he can be sober, considerate, and helpful, regardless of what anyone says or does. Of course, we all fall much below this standard many times. But we must try to repair the damage immediately lest we pay the penalty by a spree.


If there be divorce or separation, there should be no undue haste for the couple to get together. The man should be sure of his recovery. The wife should fully understand his new way of life. If their old relationship is to be resumed it must be on a better basis, since the former did not work. This means a new attitude and spirit all around. Sometimes it is to the best interests of all concerned that the couple remain apart. Obviously, no rule can be laid down. Let the alcoholic continue his program day by day. When the time for living together has come, it will be apparent to both parties.

Let no alcoholic say he cannot recover unless he has his family back. This just isn't so. In some cases the wife will never come back for one reason or another. Remind the prospect that his recovery is not dependent upon people. It is dependent upon his relationship with God. We have seen men get well whose families have not returned at all. We have seen others slip when the family came back too soon.

Both you and the new man must walk day by day in the path of spiritual progress. If you persist, remarkable things will happen. When we look back, we realize that the things which came to us when we put ourselves in God's hands were better than any thing we could have planned. Follow the dictates of a Higher Power and you will presently live in a new and wonderful world, no matter what your present circumstances.

When working with a man and his family, you should take care not to participate in their quarrels. You may spoil your chance of being helpful if you do. But urge upon a man's family that he has been a very sick person and should be treated accordingly. You should warn against arousing resentment of jealousy. You should point out that his defects of character are not going to disappear over night. Show them that he has entered upon a period of growth. Ask them to remember, when they are impatient, the blessed fact of his sobriety.

If you have been successful in solving your own domestic problems, tell the newcomer's family how that was accomplished. In this way you can set them on the right track without becoming critical of them. The story of how you and your wife settled your difficulties is worth any amount of criticism.

Assuming we are spiritually fit, we can do all sorts of things alcoholics are not supposed to do. People have said we must not go where liquor is served; we must not have it in our homes; we must shun friends who drink; we must avoid moving pictures which show drinking scenes; we must not to into bars; our friends must hide their bottles if we go to their houses; we mustn't think or be reminded about alcohol at all. Our experience shows this is not necessarily so.

We meet these conditions every day. An alcoholic who cannot meet them, still has an alcoholic mind; there is something the matter with his spiritual status. His only chance for sobriety would be some place like the Greenland Ice Cap, and even there an Eskimo might turn up with a bottle of scotch and ruin everything! Ask any woman who has sent her husband to distant places on the theory he would escape the alcohol problem.

In our belief any scheme of combating alcoholism which proposes to shield the sick man from temptation is doomed to failure. If the alcoholic tries to shield himself he may succeed for a time, but he usually winds up with a bigger explosion then ever. WE have tried these methods. These attempts to do the impossible have always failed.

So our rule is not to avoid a place where there is drinking, if we have a legitimate reason for being there. That includes bars, nightclubs, dances, receptions, weddings, even plain ordinary whoopee parties. To a person who has had experience with an alcoholic, this may seem like tempting Providence, but it isn't.

You will note that we made an important qualification. Therefore, ask yourself on each occasion, "Have I any good social, business, or personal reason for going to this place? Or am I expecting to steal a little vicarious pleasure from the atmosphere of such places?" If you answer these questions satisfactorily, you need have no apprehension. Go or stay away, whichever seems best. But be sure you are on solid spiritual ground before you start and that your motive in going is thoroughly good. Do not think of what you will get out of the occasion. Think of what you can bring to it. But if you are still shaky, you had better work with another alcoholic instead!

Why sit with a long face in places where there is drinking, sighing about the good old days. If it is a happy occasion, try to increase the pleasure of those there; if a business occasion, go and attend to your business enthusiastically. If you are with a person who wants to eat in a bar, by all means go along. Let your friends know they are not to change their habits on your account. At a proper time and place explain to all your friends why alcohol disagrees with you. If you do this thoroughly, few people will ask you to drink. While you were drinking, you were withdrawing from life little by little. Now you are getting back into the social life of this world. Don't start to withdraw again just because your friends drink liquor.

Your job now is to be at the place where you may be of maximum helpfulness to others, so never hesitate to go anywhere if you can be helpful. You should not hesitate to visit the most sordid spot on earth on such an errand. Keep on the firing line of life with those motives and God will keep you unharmed.

Many of us keep liquor in our homes. We often need it to carry green recruits through a severe hangover. Some of us still serve it to our friends provided they are not alcoholic. But some of us think we should not serve liquor to anyone. We never argue this question. We feel that each family, in the light of their own circumstance, ought to decide for themselves.

We are careful never to show intolerance or hatred of drinking as an institution. Experience shows that such an attitude is not helpful to anyone. Every new alcoholic looks for this spirit among us and is immensely relieved when he finds we are not witch burners. A spirit of intolerance might repel alcoholics whose lives could have been saved, had it not been for such stupidity. We would not even do the cause of temperate drinking any good, for not one drinking in a thousand likes to be told anything about alcohol by one who hates it.

Some day we hope that Alcoholics Anonymous will help the public to a better realization of the gravity of the alcoholic problem, but we shall be of little use if our attitude is one of bitterness or hostility. Drinkers will not stand for it.

After all, our problems were of our own making. Bottles were only a symbol. Besides, we have stopped fighting anybody or anything. We have to!

next: To the Wives
~ all Big Book articles
~ addictions library articles
~ all addictions articles

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). Working With Others, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/addictions/articles/working-with-others

Last Updated: April 26, 2019

About Dr. Robert Myers

Information about Dr. Robert Myers, author of ADD Focus, a website to assist parents of children with ADHD and adults with ADHD.Doctor Robert Myers earned his Ph.D. from the University of Southern California. He is a Licensed Psychologist and a Licensed Marriage, Family, Child Counselor in California. He has been married for 27 years and has two children, a 23 year old daughter and a 19 year old son.

In addition to his 20 years of private practice as a child psychologist, Dr. Myers has also held a number of consulting positions. These have included: Clinical Director for several youth service inpatient units at College Hospital and Charter Hospital of Long Beach; Consulting Psychologist for Miller Children's Hospital at Long Beach Memorial Medical Center; Clinical Instructor (Pediatrics), UCI College of Medicine; Adjunct Professor, Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology at BIOLA University; Director of Mental Health, Universal Care (HMO); Clinical Director, College Health IPA; Psychologist for Aspen Community Services; Research Consultant for A Better Way of Learning.

Dr. Myers has also provided community lectures on parenting and other topics. He has been a talk show host on KIEV and KORG in Southern California. He has also appeared as a guest on many radio and television talk shows locally and nationally. He also was a regular columnist for Parents and Kids Magazine.

next: ADD - ADHD Bibliography
~ back to ADD Focus homepage
~ adhd library articles
~ all add/adhd articles



APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). About Dr. Robert Myers, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/adhd/articles/about-dr-robert-myers

Last Updated: February 13, 2016

The Narcissist - From Abuse to Suicide

"Suicide - suicide! It is all wrong, I tell you. It is wrong psychologically. How did (the narcissist in the story) think of himself? As a Colossus, as an immensely important person, as the center of the universe! Does such a man destroy himself? Surely not. He is far more likely to destroy someone else - some miserable crawling ant of a human being who had dared to cause him annoyance ... Such an act may be regarded as necessary - as sanctified! But self-destruction? The destruction of such a Self? ... From the first I could not consider it likely that (the narcissist) had committed suicide. He had pronounced egomania, and such a man does not kill himself."

["Dead Man's Mirror" by Agatha Christie in "Hercule Poirot - The Complete Short Stories", Great Britain, HarperCollins Publishers, 1999]

"A surprising ... fact in the process of self-splitting is the sudden change of the object relation that has become intolerable, into narcissism. The man abandoned by all gods escapes completely from reality and creates for himself another world in which he ... can achieve everything that he wants. as been unloved, even tormented, he now splits off from himself a part which in the form of a helpful, loving, often motherly minder commiserates with the tormented remainder of the self, nurses him and decides for him ... with the deepest wisdom and most penetrating intelligence. He is ... a guardian angel (that) sees the suffering or murdered child from the outside, he wanders through the whole universe seeking help, invents phantasies for the child that cannot be saved in any other way ... But in the moment of a very strong, repeated trauma even this guardian angel must confess his own helplessness and well-meaning deceptive swindles ... and then nothing else remains but suicide ..."

[Ferenczi and Sandor - "Notes and Fragments" - International Journal of Psychoanalysis - Vol XXX (1949), p. 234]

There is one place in which one's privacy, intimacy, integrity and inviolability are guaranteed - one's body and mind, a unique temple and a familiar territory of sensa and personal history. The abuser invades, defiles and desecrates this shrine. He does so publicly, deliberately, repeatedly and, often, sadistically and sexually, with undisguised pleasure. Hence the all-pervasive, long-lasting, and, frequently, irreversible effects and outcomes of abuse.

In a way, the abuse victim's own body and mind are rendered his worse enemies. It is mental and corporeal agony that compels the sufferer to mutate, his identity to fragment, his ideals and principles to crumble. The body, one's very brain, become accomplices of the bully or tormentor, an uninterruptible channel of communication, a treasonous, poisoned territory. This fosters a humiliating dependency of the abused on the perpetrator. Bodily needs denied - touch, light, sleep, toilet, food, water, safety - and nagging reactions of guilt and humiliation are wrongly perceived by the victim as the direct causes of his degradation and dehumanization. As he sees it, he is rendered bestial not by the sadistic bullies around him but by his own flesh and consciousness.

The concepts of "body" or "psyche" can easily be extended to "family", or "home". Abuse - especially in familial settings - is often applied to kin and kith, compatriots, or colleagues. This intends to disrupt the continuity of "surroundings, habits, appearance, relations with others", as the CIA put it in one of its torture training manuals. A sense of cohesive self-identity depends crucially on the familiar and the continuous. By attacking both one's biological-mental body and one's "social body", the victim's mind is strained to the point of dissociation.

Abuse robs the victim of the most basic modes of relating to reality and, thus, is the equivalent of cognitive death. Space and time are warped by sleep deprivation - the frequent outcome of anxiety and stress. The self ("I") is shattered. When the abuser is a family member, or a group of peers, or an adult role model (for instance, a teacher), the abused have nothing familiar to hold on to: family, home, personal belongings, loved ones, language, one's own name - all seem to evaporate in the turmoil of abuse. Gradually, the victim loses his mental resilience and sense of freedom. He feels alien and objectified - unable to communicate, relate, attach, or empathize with others.

Abuse splinters early childhood grandiose narcissistic fantasies of uniqueness, omnipotence, invulnerability, and impenetrability. But it enhances the fantasy of merger with an idealized and omnipotent (though not benign) other - the inflicter of agony. The twin processes of individuation and separation are reversed.

Abuse is the ultimate act of perverted intimacy. The abuser invades the victim's body, pervades his psyche, and possesses his mind. Deprived of contact with others and starved for human interactions, the prey bonds with the predator. "Traumatic bonding", akin to the Stockholm syndrome, is about hope and the search for meaning in the brutal and indifferent and nightmarish universe of the abusive relationship. The abuser becomes the black hole at the center of the victim's surrealistic galaxy, sucking in the sufferer's universal need for solace. The victim tries to "control" his tormentor by becoming one with him (introjecting him) and by appealing to the monster's presumably dormant humanity and empathy.

This bonding is especially strong when the abuser and the abused form a dyad and "collaborate" in the rituals and acts of abuse (for instance, when the victim is coerced into selecting the abuse implements and the types of torment to be inflicted, or to choose between two evils).


 


Obsessed by endless ruminations, demented by pain and the reactions to maltreatment - sleeplessness, malnutrition, and substance abuse - the victim regresses, shedding all but the most primitive defense mechanisms: splitting, narcissism, dissociation, Projective Identification, introjection, and cognitive dissonance. The victim constructs an alternative world, often suffering from depersonalization and derealization, hallucinations, ideas of reference, delusions, and psychotic episodes. Sometimes the victim comes to crave pain - very much as self-mutilators do - because it is a proof and a reminder of his individuated existence otherwise blurred by the incessant abuse. Pain shields the sufferer from disintegration and capitulation. It preserves the veracity of his unthinkable and unspeakable experiences. It reminds him that he can still feel and, therefore, that he is still human.

These dual processes of the victim's alienation and addiction to anguish complement the perpetrator's view of his quarry as "inhuman", or "subhuman". The abuser assumes the position of the sole authority, the exclusive fount of meaning and interpretation, the source of both evil and good.

Abuse is about reprogramming the victim to succumb to an alternative exegesis of the world, proffered by the abuser. It is an act of deep, indelible, traumatic indoctrination. The abused also swallows whole and assimilates the abuser's negative view of him and often, as a result, is rendered suicidal, self-destructive, or self-defeating.

Thus, abuse has no cut-off date. The sounds, the voices, the smells, the sensations reverberate long after the episode has ended - both in nightmares and in waking moments. The victim's ability to trust other people - i.e., to assume that their motives are at least rational, if not necessarily benign - has been irrevocably undermined. Social institutions - even the family itself - are perceived as precariously poised on the verge of an ominous, Kafkaesque mutation. Nothing is either safe, or credible anymore.

Victims typically react by undulating between emotional numbing and increased arousal: insomnia, irritability, restlessness, and attention deficits. Recollections of the traumatic events intrude in the form of dreams, night terrors, flashbacks, and distressing associations.

The abused develop compulsive rituals to fend off obsessive thoughts. Other psychological sequelae reported include cognitive impairment, reduced capacity to learn, memory disorders, sexual dysfunction, social withdrawal, inability to maintain long term relationships, or even mere intimacy, phobias, ideas of reference and superstitions, delusions, hallucinations, psychotic microepisodes, and emotional flatness. Depression and anxiety are very common. These are forms and manifestations of self-directed aggression. The sufferer rages at his own victimhood and resulting multiple dysfunctions.

He feels shamed by his new disabilities and responsible, or even guilty, somehow, for his predicament and the dire consequences borne by his nearest and dearest. His sense of self-worth and self-esteem are crippled. Suicide is perceived as both a relief and a solution.

In a nutshell, abuse victims suffer from a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Their strong feelings of anxiety, guilt, and shame are also typical of victims of childhood abuse, domestic violence, and rape. They feel anxious because the perpetrator's behavior is seemingly arbitrary and unpredictable - or mechanically and inhumanly regular.

They feel guilty and disgraced because, to restore a semblance of order to their shattered world and a modicum of dominion over their chaotic life, they need to transform themselves into the cause of their own degradation and the accomplices of their tormentors.

Inevitably, in the aftermath of abuse, its victims feel helpless and powerless. This loss of control over one's life and body is manifested physically in impotence, attention deficits, and insomnia. This is often exacerbated by the disbelief many abuse victims encounter, especially if they are unable to produce scars, or other "objective" proof of their ordeal. Language cannot communicate such an intensely private experience as pain.

Bystanders resent the abused because they make them feel guilty and ashamed for having done nothing to prevent the atrocity. The victims threaten their sense of security and their much-needed belief in predictability, justice, and rule of law. The victims, on their part, do not believe that it is possible to effectively communicate to "outsiders" what they have been through. The abuse seems to have occurred on "another galaxy". This is how Auschwitz was described by the author K. Zetnik in his testimony in the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem in 1961.

Often, continued attempts to repress fearful memories result in psychosomatic illnesses (conversion). The victim wishes to forget the abuse, to avoid re-experiencing the often life threatening torment and to shield his human environment from the horrors. In conjunction with the victim's pervasive distrust, this is frequently interpreted as hypervigilance, or even paranoia. It seems that the victims can't win. Abuse is forever.

When the victim realizes that the abuse he suffered is now an integral part of his very being, a determinant of his self-identity, and that he is doomed to bear his pains and fears, shackled to his trauma, and tortured by it - suicide often appears to be a benign alternative.


 

next: The Narcissist - From Abuse to Suicide

APA Reference
Vaknin, S. (2008, December 31). The Narcissist - From Abuse to Suicide, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/personality-disorders/malignant-self-love/the-narcissist-from-abuse-to-suicide

Last Updated: July 3, 2018

Good Sex Is Good for You!

how to have good sex

"Life without love is like a coconut in which the milk is dried up."
-Henry David Thoreau

"Good sex....Improves our health and may even contribute to our longevity."


Scientific evidence is accumulating support what many of us have suspected all along: good sex not only adds great enjoyment to our lives, but it also actually improves our health and may even contribute to our longevity.

In a new book called Sexual Healing, Dr. Paul Pearsall, Director of Behavioral Medicine at Detroit's Beaumont Hospital, writes that the joys and pleasures of living life and loving may provide us with something called an "intimacy inoculation" that actually protects us from disease.

Dr. Pearsall, who cites numerous other researchers, concludes, "Growing numbers of physicians now recognize that the health of the human heart depends not only on such factors as genetics, diet, and exercise, but also --to a large extent-- on the social and emotional health of the individual."

Sexual healing is achieved primarily through the daily challenge of maintaining a close, intimate relationship which, when accomplished, leads to balance between our health and healing systems.

Can lack of sexual intimacy create a risk factor for certain diseases? Dr. Pearsall cites research and his own clinical experience indicating that sexual dissatisfaction seems to be prevalent prior to a heart attack in a high percentage of persons. Conversely, sexual contentment appears related to less severe migraine headaches, fewer and less-severe symptoms of premenstrual syndrome for women, and a reduction in symptoms related to chronic arthritis for both genders.

Although the exact biological mechanisms are not yet identified, many researchers are investigating how our thoughts, feelings, brain, immune system and sexual/genital system interact, influence each other, and affect our health. There may be an actual biological drive toward closeness, intimacy, and being connected to other human beings.


 


When we experience intimate, mutually caring sexual intimacy, we may experience a measurable change in neurochemicals and hormones that pour through the body and help promote health and healing.


"Hormones that pour through the body help promote health and healing."


Click to buy Women Who Love Sex: An Inquiry into the Expanding Spirit of Women's Erotic ExperienceDoes this mean that to live longer or be more healthy we just need to DO IT more often or better? Of course not! Sex is a much broader concept that genital connecting or having an orgasm. Psychologist and author Gina Ogden, Ph.D. notes in her book, "Women Who Love Sex", that sex has everything to do with openness, connection to and bonding with a partner, feelings about what is happening to us, and memories. For those who love it, sex permeates their lives and is not merely a specialized, time-intensive, physical activity that takes place under the covers--as quickly as possible.

As a result of interviewing many women, Dr. Ogden learned that sexual desire, or lust, was produced by much more than physical stimulation. For women, according to Dr.Ogden, it has more to do with feelings of connectedness in their relationships: "Heart to heart, soul to soul, even mind to mind."


"For women, it has to do with feelings of connectedness in their relationships."


When discussing sexual connecting, Dr. Ogden's interviewees spoke of a FLOWING CONTINUUM OF PLEASURE, ORGASM, AND ECSTASY, rather than a one-time experience. They also described peak sexual experiences as coming from stimulation all over their bodies--not just from their genitals--including fingers, toes, hips, lips, neck, and earlobes.

Obviously, arousal and satisfaction evolve not only from receiving sexual energy, but also from the joy of stimulating one's partner. Sex, then, is a commitment of give and take.

Finally, the women Dr. Ogden studied have their own concepts of safe sex, essential to experiencing sexual pleasure and ecstasy. This kind of safe sex does NOT relate to preventing STDs or pregnancy; it relates, instead, to emotional and spiritual safety. Such safety is CRUCIAL for sexual closeness. Most of the women insisted that warm, loving connections with themselves and with their partners were essential to and inseparable from the experience of sexual ecstasy.

When people feel deeply close while merely holding hands, they are having sex. When people display caring for each other through hugs, caresses, and kissing, they are also having sex. When connecting people in a crowded room wink at each other in their own secret way, they are communicating sex to each other; such non-contact sex can be excitedly arousing and emotionally fulfilling. And, of course, during sexual union when the sky seems to open so a lightning bolt can strike the couple--while fireworks ignite and the earth stops spinning-- this is sex, too.

But wait. Do men also need this almost spiritual connection to enjoy sex and achieve good health? Well, yes and no. Men need sex and men need emotional connection, but many men don't necessarily need to put the two together!

Click to buy The New Male SexualityAccording to Dr. Bernie Zilbergelt, who wrote The New Male Sexuality, sex for women is intertwined with personal connection. For some men , sex is unto itself--an act to be engaged in with or without love, with or without commitment, with or without connection.

Presently, younger boys are being socialized in a more enlightened manner; consequently, male attitudes toward sexual union are changing. But, unfortunately, the socialization of many men born in or before the 60's provided very little information of value to the formation and maintenance of intimate relationships. These men were taught, as youths, that males showed love by doing, not by talking or "connecting" with girls.


"Fortunately, anyone can...restore closeness, intimacy, and sexual flow."


Older men were usually also socialized to be strong and self-reliant, which usually means one doesn't easily talk about or admit personal problems. Many such men do not acknowledge worries and fears to their partners; they simply try to handle everything on their own.

A consequence of such reticence is (1) lack of intimacy in the relationship, with the wife feeling "left out" of her husband's life; and (2) men often don't get what they need because they don't know how to ask for it, so they feel distanced and frustrated when they really want closeness and intimacy as much as their partner does.

Sex under these conditions creates distance in the relationship or creates sexual dysfunction which drives an even deeper wedge into the relationship. This is especially true if a man is married to a woman must be wanted by her husband to have her sexuality validated.

Consequently, sex routinely becomes mechanical, unfeeling, and unfulfilling. Fortunately, anyone can break this vicious cycle and restore closeness, intimacy, and sexual flow in the relationship.


Author, Anthony Fiore, Ph.D., is in private practice, teaches sex therapy, and owns September Products, a multimedia resource center to enhance relationships and improve sexuality. 1450 N. Tustin Ave., Suite 200, Santa Ana, Ca., 92701.
Voice: 714-771-0378.
Fax: 714-953-9717.

next: Knowing What You Want in Bed

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). Good Sex Is Good for You!, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/sex/psychology-of-sex/good-sex-is-good-for-you

Last Updated: May 2, 2016

Are You a Compulsive Online Gambler?

Take our Compulsive Online Gambling Test. Answer "yes" or "no" to the following statements:

  1. Do you need to gamble with increasing amounts of money in order to achieve the desired excitement?
  2. Are you preoccupied with gambling (thinking about the next bet, anticipating your next online session)?
  3. Have you lied to friends and family members to conceal extent of your online gambling?
  4. Do you feel restless or irritable when attempting to cut down or stop online gambling?
  5. Have you made repeated unsuccessful efforts to control, cut back, or stop online gambling?
  6. Do you use gambling as a way of escaping from problems or relieve feelings of helplessness, guilt, anxiety, or depression?
  7. Have you jeopardized or lost a significant relationship, job, or educational or career opportunity because of online gambling?
  8. Have you committed illegal acts such as forgery, fraud, theft, or embezzlement to finance online activities?

Caught in the Net, the first and only recovery book on Internet addiction to help rebuild your relationshipIf you answered "yes" to any of the above questions, you may be a compulsive online gambler. These are signs that you have lost control, lied, or possibly stole money just to support your trading behavior.

Why wait until it is too late to seek out help? Contact our Virtual Clinic today to receive fast, caring, and confidential advice for dealing with compulsive online gambling. Our Virtual Clinic is also designed to help family members, such as a spouse or parent, to cope with Internet addiction in your home. Professional help is available directly with Dr. Kimberly Young, Founder and President of the Center for On-Line Addiction.

And read Caught in the Net, the first recovery book for Internet Addiction. Click here to order Caught in the Net.



next: The legal ramifications of Internet Addiction.
~ all center for online addiction articles
~ all articles on addictions

APA Reference
Staff, H. (2008, December 31). Are You a Compulsive Online Gambler?, HealthyPlace. Retrieved on 2024, October 10 from https://www.healthyplace.com/addictions/center-for-internet-addiction-recovery/compulsive-online-gambling-test

Last Updated: June 24, 2016