| 
Presented to
United Nations Convention on Child Rights
June 9, 1999,
by Nancy Faulkner, Ph.D
on behalf of
P.A.R.E.N.T.
and
Victims of Parental Child Abduction
© Nancy Faulkner 1999 Page 5
Guilt.
It is difficult for some to understand the guilt felt by a victim, particularly when the victim is a child. Survivors of
childhood sexual abuse continue to remind us that they felt guilt -- guilt that
they may have in some way brought on the abuse, guilt for feeling some sensate
pleasure, guilt for destruction of the family constellation when the abuse was
discovered, and guilt for legal consequences to the offender.
Literature on divorce is deplete with references to children feeling that
they had somehow brought about difficulties between their parents and were
responsible for the culminating division of the family. The guilt of abducted
children is not dissimilar.
"These children are extremely guilty when they return and are
very fearful of the reaction of the other parent. They do not know who to
believe, the are bewildered and very fearful. Many children have a sense that
the stealing was their fault and that it could have been avoided. They feel to
blame for both the stealing and for the divorce. Many of the older children
feel very guilty about not having tried to contact the parent victim. These
children feel it is not possible to have a relationship with both parents, and
they are town between them. It is not uncommon to see total confusion when they
are returned, particularly with a sense of being returned to a stranger."
(Huntington, 1982, p. 8)
Acute Stress Disorder
and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.
The diagnoses of Acute Stress Disorder and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
are commonly applied by professionals to victims of abuse situations, such as
sexual abuse and child abduction, when the presenting symptoms and applicable
conditions apply. According to the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders (1997), a person suffering from Acute Stress
Disorder has been exposed to a traumatic event in which both of the following
were present:
- The person experienced, witnessed, or was confronted with an event or
events that involved actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat
to the physical integrity of self or others;
- The person's response involved intense fear, helplessness, or horror.
Either while experiencing or after experiencing the distressing event, the
individual has three (or more) of the following dissociative symptoms:
- A subjective sense of numbing, detachment, or absence of emotional
responsiveness;
- A reduction in awareness of his or her surroundings (e.g., "being in a
daze");
- Derealization;
- Depersonalization;
- Dissociative amnesia (i.e., inability to recall an important aspect of the
trauma).
Like many reactive effects and symptoms discussed in the sections above,
this diagnostic category also includes marked symptoms of anxiety or increased
arousal (e.g., difficulty sleeping, irritability, poor concentration,
hypervigilance, exaggerated startle response, motor restlessness). A victim of
abuse may meet the criteria for this diagnosis when the disturbance causes
clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other
important areas of functioning; or, when the disturbance impairs the
individual's ability to pursue some necessary task, such as obtaining necessary
assistance or mobilizing personal resources by telling family members about the
traumatic experience.
back to top | pages
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
home | email us |
send this
page
|